Another T-80? Gimme a break!
Negative!
3 Likes
Nice suggestion. The amount of T-80s in the USSR tree is a bit ridiculous atm tho.
3 Likes
we neeed this!!!
1 Like
Better go with the Burlak module. Otherwise, it’s just a regular T-80BVM, with the only real difference being the APS. The Burlak, on the other hand, is a whole new turret with a bustle autoloader that can load longer APFSDS. We already have another T-80BVM in the game files. we don’t need a third BVM. Even if the Burlak will still technically be a BVM, it’s got a way better turret
Both can be added
5 Likes
Hence we dont need Eastern European Soviet derivatives in the Ru tree … coz there’s already so much left still to be added.
How is it? if you didnt grind out events you get a maximum of three in the TT.
One of which is at 10.7, the other two are closer in BR but hte T80U really does suck for its BR, this thing would and could be a welcome change ot the USSR top tier tedium.
Much like we should see more of the earlier prototypes.
hell id love the object 277 in game!
Yup, it is sad for it’s br because of the FCS, (ESPECIALLY the vertical traverse speed and it being limited to 14°) and reverse speed. Otherwise it is a good sniping tank
1 Like
I do wish it had a better round but yeah agreed
Its a pretty solid backup to the T-80BVM
There are always ways to expand the tree. We do not need separate Eastern European nations for that.
1 Like
+1 with the Burlak turret for extra style points
1 Like
i hope this gets added!