Nuclear weapons in naval battles?

If the atomic bomb was added to the naval battle , how to make the atomic bomb functional?
Or is there a similar mechanism that can replace the atomic bomb?
The biggest problem is that the power of the atomic bomb is not big enough in naval battles.
It seems strange and illogical to end a naval battle with a single tactical atomic bomb.
The Prinz Eugen was hit by two atomic bombs at a distance of 1,000 and 1,800 meters.
“But the Prinz Eugen, which was 1,194 yards from the center of the explosion, was only slightly damaged.”
“The Prinz Eugen, which was 1,990 yards from the center of the explosion, still survived and was not even seriously damaged.”
Unless a Tsar nuclear bomb is sent to each ship, otherwise it is hard to destroy every ship.

I personally hope that such a mechanic will never be added to naval.
That a single player who has had a good game can easily turn the score around and give the victory to his team when the opposing team has done better as a whole does not seem very fair to me.

4 Likes

htf no

3 Likes

To win naval battles depends largely on the occupation of the points.But naval maps are so large that it’s impossible for one player to control all 3 points.And quite often many teammates can’t or don’t want to capture the points , making the gaming fail.Larger ships like BB can hardly capture points because they are slow.There has been a lot of times that I killed a lot of enemy but they respawn mtbs and capture 2 points then win the game.I can’t just J out frome my BB to respawn a mtb to fight against enemy mtb that want to capture points.

noway.

especially considering the state of naval AA…
mantis