Nuclear Thunder!

i kinda wish the B52 and TU-95 where made tech tree as gaijin could probably balance them out as they are pretty decent at there brs from what i can tell

if radar gun sight ever gets added i feel the TU95 and B52 will be good

hopefully we see B1A and B and TU160/TU22 at some point that be awesome i feel B1A will be a better addition than B1B just cause the B1A can do mach 2 and the B1B cant

3 Likes

Is there a reason Gaijin to decide to ignore people’s settings of joining in-progress match?

Event is kind of fun, and it’s also actually something new, so that’s amazing - But joining a match that is few seconds away from ending is kind of waste of time.

(No, I’m not salty about that one time when I got nuked on main airfield with my 250% boosters on within 5 seconds of joining the game) :D

1 Like

A BUK fired a missile at me from behind a hill, and the second fragment is a MiG-29 flying over the base as if it were at home.


I’ve spent way too much time using CCRP and I’ve built up a strange love for it. Anyways toss bombing ☢️RN-28’s is the way to go

3 Likes

Cries in harrier

3 Likes

It’s so easy to win as USA, it’s kinda blatantly unfair to USSR.

F-4J and F-4S are just monsters.

What’s weird is the MiG-23 doesn’t get the RN-40… yet it could carry it, but the F-4E gets both B61’s

1 Like

i have been thinking a little bit about it, but would this mode with some small modifications be good for helicopters? they sit in a weird spot where helicopter ai battles is not good, and the only real way to get them is grinding that or ground realistic, i think this might be an interesting way to teach countering of anti air with helicopters and also be a good way to get through that tree in a better way, thoughts?

1 Like

IIRC “burning through ECM” is attributed to SMERCH radar, not Sapfir-25 of MiG-25PD

If you don’t fly on the red line, you’re dead

Using a R24T close range to B52 at 3km lock them up aim up near gimbal limit the seeker wont see the flares

1 Like

Special earth see through radar dropped

3 Likes

Can I ask a stupid question? Do people really use Keyboard and Mouse for Realistic Battles? Or is it Controllers or HOTAS?

Mouse+keyboard is superior for arcade and realistic imo. HOTAS for sims

5 Likes

100%, most RB players fly with Mouse and Keyboard. There might be some RB players who use Joystick and HOTAS, but they would be an extremely small portion of the RB playerbase. Like, a % of a %, maybe even a % of a % of a %.

As far as controllers, I think you will see those mostly used by Console players. There are definitely some PC players who use a controller, not many, but for sure more than use Joystick and HOTAS in RB.

You are only ‘forced’ to use a different control scheme in Simulator. You can use mouse and keybaord in SIM, but I think most players using at least a joystick for SIM.

If you have not seen what the SIM mouse controls are like, you can test for yourself in a test drive.

1 Like

since when do wel call F4S F4s33MC?

1 Like

it’s a lang mod

2 Likes

With lang mods u can change it to whatever u want, can’t u?

no, i dont use any kind of mods

Eh me neither, but I’m pretty sure they provide advantages. For example a lang mod could make the killfeed more informative.

EnemyInBlue48(Pz.IV H) >PzGr 39> Teamate_In_Red47(T-34)

becomes

EnemyInBlue48(Pz IV Ausf. H(1943)>PzGr 39 APHECBC-T>Teamate_In_Red47(T-34 mod.1942)

in this example it highlights the T-34’s specific model and exactly what type of ammo PzGr39 is

2 Likes