All it takes is enough energy. The problem is that the Phantom bleeds energy really quickly, setting you up for a second missile
1 Like
This is Gaijin we are talking about. The AAA are regularly placed under the map.
But more telling for this behavior is the fact that the larger SAM sites (BUK, Hawk, S-300, Patriot) only fire one missile at a time, even when they are perfectly capable of firing multiple.
Don’t mind that person too much, if something isn’t exactly how they want it, when they want it and where they want it it’s suddenly bad/worthless/shouldn’t happen.
@Smin1080p_WT is it planned to add aircraft carrier and player/AI controlled ships to this event in the future? Large chunk of the map is ocean, so I am curious
Dude Russian teams are already well off with the 9-13 and MLD being insane. The R-27 and R-73 combo is disgusting and you want more of them on a better plane??
We cannot be serious rn.
1 Like
As someone who actually uses the plane, I’ve only killed unaware people that refuse to notch or evade with Phoenixes. Missile diamonds still exist so the poor RWR argument can’t hold weight.
don’t think it’s working as intended
4 Likes
I do one thing that works good enough with them. I target people way behind the line and from altitude , they don’t expect it…
Just be aware that s300 can shoot down the missiles if something is too far back.
As soon as i kept my discipline with it i was in a 5:1KD/R and i was never practically threatened.
The problem is…it’s kinda boring and time consuming. You can get better results (in points) if you actually fight. But for the memes it was fun.
1 Like
US needs a better stock fighter the F4E is pretty bad. We need f4j
Stop censoring all the criticism
You will find over 6000 comments giving instructive feedback and no arguments.
Yours was just a rant with 0 feedback and you started to argue with someone.
Anyway this isn’t the place for discussing removed comments, You can do so in pm’s with us.
5 Likes
Roland was given 10 ready to fire while Osa was given 6. It visually only has 2, but it can fire 10 afaik. I think it was done as a balance feature since the Osa is better in every other metric.
In the low tier? Man i play 4J, it will masacre them… a few 4J/S in the mix are ok and in the games i played we always have 4-5 players with them.
If you ask me we just need a F-111F , the thing could carry HARMs and nukes. Pretty similar with SU-24.
And the F-4E i’m pretty sure it could carry Shrike from the box without mods.
The ground pound options US has are pretty lacking , even against the subsonic Su-25T…Clearly SU-24 is from another planet in comparison.
And that’s why US loses in the lower bracket. They don’t have capable “delivery” systems…
So the US queue trick is to go with no air vehicle in your lineup. I have instant queued as the US the last 2 days doing this and having joint match in progress turned on
I actually do agree, having no pulse Doppler radar leaves all except the air to air load out without self defense weaponry (excluding cannons of course) unless the enemy is at extremely specific altitudes or higher. I say they give load outs AIM-9Ls at least or the F-4J with its DP radar to better match the MiG-23.
Absolutely no to the F-111 being a nuke carrier, at least in the current state
The Su-24 caps out at mach 1.1 at low altitude. The F-111 would easily be able to hit mach 1.3+, making interception all but impossible.
The MIG 23 nuke spam is bad enough right now. What you are asking for is essentially that problem dialed up to 11
111A is the slow one
He asked in context to adding the 111F.
The event F4E does have Aim-9L’s
Only on the nuke and air to air load outs, on the other load outs there is no defensive capability