And I’ve been saying it needs 833 and you all have been viciously ignoring it or copping that it needs to go up to balance because you all can’t deal with an M1 having a fourth-tier round with parity to a DM23.
1 Like
It appears he’s trying to deflect by trying to seem like we claimed M774 is a god tier shell
1 Like
No it appears you all want to keep the M1 same as for yourselves.
But why, m774 pens the leopards UFP fine already it even pens the turret just under the gun sight while the leopard itself cant do that to the abrams
You know im getting pretty tired of you screeching about parity this parity that should we give everyone a 292 Equivalent sabot so they all have shell parity? I mean in doing so literally nobody would play anything but the abrams since it would have the best mobility paired with gun handling
2 Likes
No, I’m just tired of proving that the 774 is a lackluster round and y’all diminishing it and saying, “No, we suffered, thus other players must suffer.”
I was tired of y’all when you first started the personal attacks 5 days ago.
How are you suffering with M774 im genuinely confused i do monumentally better in the abrams than i do with soviet equivalents despite this apparently bad shell why do you keep downplaying the advantages the abrams has over a ton of tanks at the br
1 Like
Never said that. Said that the m1 has plenty of strengths that it can lean on to mitigate having a poor shell. We proved it’s good enough as a shell and that the M1 is fine without m833.
2 Likes
And I’m saying the play experience isn’t entirely fine and M833 would help a little bit.
I’m not repeating what I’ve made clear from the beginning. Y’all keep plugging your ears and screaming at the top of your lungs like you think M833 would be OP or that it doesn’t need it.
But then make up the excuse that I’d demand the M900 next?
1 Like
Those t80 stats are shamefur
Again why does it need help it already is arguably the best 10.7 tank do to a multitude of factors
best gun handling at the tier
Better reload than most tanks
Great mobility
Great gun depression
Better survivability even as shown by your own clip
Good turret armour for hull down
Spaced out crew
1 Like
Cant stand not having a reverse gear or gun depression along with the worse reload compared to western equivalents its pretty much an uphill battle on most maps
1 Like
Zozzed off of DU fumes
2 Likes
I don’t need to make an excuse for that theres quite literally already a thread with people whining about the M1 not having M900 but they also want it to stay at 10.7
1 Like
kino
1 Like
Arguing with a brick wall… a German brick wall at that.
You called me a criminal before and never really quantified that statement.
And I never brought up M900. Others did.
as for more proof of how this company acts (Updated) All Abrams Are Missing Their Integrated Spall Liner // Gaijin.net // Issues
they don’t " BELIEVE " the Abrams has n integrated spall liner
Not within the crew compartment, no. They believe that and insofar as my experience and knowledge, no. But it does have integrated spall liners in the composite matrix that they can’t model.
They also could still add flak vests.
But that’s a different topic, obviously.
1 Like
they can easily model it.