That’s a t-90m. Confirmed to have spall liners. Not an Abrams.
Also off topic. Please discuss in relevant thread.
4 Likes
I didn’t ignore it, I just found it interesting how you repeatedly dismissed when I was comparing a testing range to real gameplay against live players with the M1 KVT. Chalk it up to learning about your character.
Yet you keep refusing to address it.
1 Like
What??
Huh???
I mean your live gameplay had shown what casinos testing had shown which is the fact that every shot that wasnt on the auto bounce penned the leopard
1 Like
It getting a bit heat up in here. We should keep being civil. Before the mod come and lock this threads down.
2 Likes
At 60 degrees. The only relevant number on those score cards.
2 Likes
At 60° the only relevant number to look at past 5.3
1 Like
That’s what they would want. Hence why I keep reiterating that there are individuals who will lambast others and attempt to disregulate them emotionally so that no productive conversation takes place regarding tank improvement.
1 Like
Isnt that literally what your friend Sartt is doing right now by posting random tank wrecks?
1 Like
Address the point so they shut up then
2 Likes
He means at 60°
now that i think about it is m900 m900a1 or are they different rounds?
Id ont think a1 is in game
Are you mixing up m900 and m1000A1?
i dont even know what m1000a1 is
So M829A2 is nearly as effective as Zaraysk?
Sartt isn’t my friend. He simply has his outlook on the M1 and its treatment, including the treatment of the M1A1 and M1A2.
Insofar as my goals here, I think lots of players are welcoming of the idea of putting the 833 round on the Abrams.
There’s only a few outliers, like yourself, who speak in horrible personal terms of other players here in the forums, who seemingly want to keep it “the same”.
1 Like
Finnish T-55M gets it
1 Like
i know the last i heard about it was like 10 years ago and it said it increased penetration by 11% but was still under a2 round
1 Like