This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
It is obvious at all top SPAA that only Russia （Pantsir SM）has the capability to shoot down LDIRCM helicopters.
This is extremely unfair
I am sorry but if you do want a post written in my englisch wich is worse than probably 6th grade native. i plugged in a text with errors in to the ai to give me easy to read texts. nothing more nothing less. all the information is from me all the points are made and come up by me, its just the grammer wich i am not good at. I could have made it in german but you probably dont know german so yeah i am sorry atleast i was open about it being corrected by ai not like some other shit posters.
No
If we went full Brochures, there is no reason that the JAS39C SAAF was limited with the R-Darter when SAAB brochures about the Gripen say it has AIM-120 capability.
I think we argued about Brochures nearly months ago but seems you are running same blunder.
@Stockholm_Blend
Nice example of Brochures being treated equally.
R-Darter is seen as a sidegrade to AIM-120B by the devs [and probably at least many players as well].
AIM-120B was suggested, and ultimately the devs said no because the vehicle has what they see as a sidegrade to the missile already.
They listened and gave an answer.
On top of that, AIM-120 isn’t a “Brochure item”, it’s an item on many documents and photographs from countless sources; A blunder on your post’s part.
Total BS
No? With due respect, did you forget your daily pill?
Back in the day when ARH missiles except phoenix drops, R-darter/derby were DRASTICALLY INFERIOR to AIM-120A/B in almost all aspects except close combat.
Probably not anymore tho.
What I mean is,
1- SAAB making brochures or something to advertise the thing
2- If Gaijin really treats all brochures equally
3- There is no reason not to give SAAF Gripen AIM-120 capability.
4- So, your countertake about OP’s take is wrong.
So all I can think about this part is a lame projection of yours.
Or maybe you are way too captivated with those Meridian Webster Dictionary terms, enough to miss common use of language.
1 Like
33 win rate IRIST SLM 32 win rate CLAWS … 67 win rate Buk . Your Data is the best evidence
Although you haven’t new Pantsir SM , but the Pantsir SM sure > Buk,SLM,CLAWS…
theres also how the amraam ER is massively under preforming in both speed and range for some reason
because gaijin is just ignoring every source out there for its rocket motor
How is that remotely connect to with this bs…
Whether it’s the average data or your data or mine, they all clearly indicate that NATO SPAA is inefficient and offers no help in achieving victory
btw … “my data”
IRIS-T - 1,7 Air frags / battle; 1,3 Air frag / death
CLAWS - 1,1 Air frags / battle; 1,0 Air frag / death
Buk - 1,2 Air frags / battle; 0,6 Air frag / death
Try again…
Win rate compare to KD is more effective data
Kill enemy it is for win
I get that you’re not very good at reading… that explains a lot.
Ok when someone gets anxious and cannot provide evidence for his opinion, he begins to launch personal attacks
xD
your gaslighting skills are worst then your reading…
Speaking of brochures, remember how they literally rejected a NEXTER Brochure that said AZUR is NERA and then quoted some medium article that couldn’t tell the difference between AZUR and CLARA?
xD maybe you can really as a reading Doctor on the internet. teenager
A thief crying “stop thief!”… how mature… well after deduction such as these:
it’s hardly surprising…
What did who steal? Did your ability to talk nonsense come from your parents’ arguments?