Money. Gaijin makes a lot of money from the F5 being severely undertiered (and overperforming in flight model)
just like why the 2s38, BMD4, Turm 3 and many other premiums are so low in BR
1 Like
by that logic every plane that can carry a sidewinder should recive the magic 1 since they use the same pylons
By your* logic, as you speak for yourself and you didn’t read my post before replying.
AIM-9E uses the launching system of AIM-9B, the system of the aircraft sees both as the same missile.
AIM-9L for the air force as an example changed the standard from previous AIM-9s.
On top of that Magic uses its own rail standard.
@Caernarvon02
2S38 was already fixed.
oh shit, i just realized i replied that to the wrong person
i was meant to reply to this comment
1 Like
Doesn’t make sense to reply to me with that either
dw about it, it does
No, it doesn’t. Explain how if you think it does. Nothing I said had anything to do with what you said, nothing.
The F-5C (should not have) 9Es, (none the less), 9Ps).
The F-5C should not have either missile based on historical elements.
You:
Makes no sense to say this in reply to what I just said.
yes it does.
you:
The F-5C (should not have) 9Es, (none the less), 9Ps).
The F-5C should not have either missile based on historical elements.
me:
the aim9E entered service after the F-5c was retired
you reading a different comment that was a repply to a different comment
Still doesn’t make any sense to reply to my comment