AMX-10RCR would definitely be nice to have, but the VEXTRA is a more urgent requirement for addition.
After having bought the F1C-200, I’m reminded that this should have been the Rank VII premium rather then the copy paste of what we have now.
This would be a very attractive premium rather then what we have now that only serves the purpose of grinding because we have nothing better and only keep making small steps towards something worth it.
The armement is the same as the F1C, and I shouldn’t have to explain it would benefit everyone if added.
HMS Warspite at the very least to temper the Scharnhorst’s. The UK needs more ships.
Nice French flag on the turret, good addition to France ! :p
Warspite had to be fashionable whilst she pummeled her enemies.
Id rather have this the AMX10RCR T40M
Since my beloved Vark has been added what not I shall now go on a Fencer copium arc specifically because I want any to catch all the swinging doohickeys like pokemon
So with that said, Su-24 when?
north korean tanks!
T-34/122
I think there different enough to have both.
Both. Both is good.
High tier kf41 like tanks for germany without needing the kf41.
Like the Marder CCV/Evolution
The boxer ifv wheeled or tracked
The kf31
The ACV puma 25mm variants 2x 440hp and 2x 750hp
The TH495 25MM or mk30-2
The Marder 2
Marder M12
Thats 12 potential good high tier tanks for germany.
Ill settle for these if we cant get the kf41. Some of them are probably better anyways.
T-80A (Object 219A) at 10.7-11.0 BR.
Imagine T-80BV (with updated UFP, not the one from T-80B, or basically T-80U UFP but with Kontakt 1 and not Kontakt 5) with GTD-1000M engine producing 1200 hp, weight of 45,2 tons, giving it a hp/t ratio of 26,6, this being better than T-80B and being worse than T-80Us and T-80BVM. It has around same turret armour compared to T-80U, again having no Kontakt 5 (turret was taken from T-64BM (soviet project, not Ukrainian modification, featuring new turret), fire control is 1A42 but with presense of PKN-4 and 1G46 like on T-80U in game ( but no thermals)
In the end we recieve slightly better T-80B (slightly better HP/T ratio (25~ hp/t vs 26~ hp/t, better protection (UFP of T-80BV and turret of T-80U without Kontakt 5, better sights but no thermals (sort of trade off), turret rotation speed as well as depression remain the same, being fitted with 3BM42, 9M119 (T-80A could use it)
First prototypes were produced in 1982, starting from 1983-1985 several more were produced, difference being the Kontakt 1 appearance. On the picture above we have T-80A in Kubinka museum, this prototype being produced in 1984.
T-62A
Practically a T62 but with 2A24 100mm gun. It has better characteristics than typical D-10S found on T-54/55 tanks, so performance of APHE is better, as well as APDS (historically it shouldnt recieve APDSFS).
SEPAR has no stabilizer and only brings weight to the 10RC, it’s not good at all.
At least T40 brings a stabilized 40mm
It has an APS, maybe commander thermals, as well as slightly more reliable armor.
It has soft kill and that’s it. NO CITV and the armour makes it immune to 14,5 max. It’s not a good upgrade.
Not good enough to justify the cost of a new model.
Instead Gaijin could spend the money on a stabilized variant that would bring meaningful improvment to the tree.
France does not need more subpar vehicles
I personally still want to see it. It’s still a later version of the AMX-10RC. Even could be a mod for the existing one
I’ll have to take another look but I’ll take your word for it.
Which is why I said that the VEXTRA is more important of an addition. The T40 likewise can wait until after the Jaguar.
The initial three T-90S variants trialed by India:
Variant 1:
Cast turret with Buran-PA night sight and IR searchlight. No Shtora system but fitted with V-92S diesel engine.
Variant 2:
Cast turret with T01-P06 Nocturne thermal imaging sight + full Shtora system with dazzlers and fitted with V-92S diesel engine.
Variant 3:
Welded turret with Essa sight and Shtora systems but without the dazzlers as well as fitted with V-92S diesel engine.