I dont think it would be
2 Likes
There’s a reason why I said “conventional”. But this one is definitely in the top 7 maybe, depending on what values you use for range, fire rate and accuracy.
1 Like
yeah that one would be up there
but no match for the ~30hp/t and 5s autoloader in terms of what matters for the game
I thought it was rheinmetalls proposal for them but tbh I barely follow american programs so.
Would be cool anyway
All this talk about adding new artillery systems when I’m still wondering why indirect fire vehicles are even in a game about the parts of warfare they aren’t designed for…
cough cough bigger maps gaijin cough cough
2 Likes
I’ll be honest, whilst I would prefer it if self-propelled howitzers were given their proper functioning (Note: only the SPH, SPG are fine since they are designed for both indirect and direct support) that will become a tricky feature in and of itself, if the other game is anything to go by…
(one of the primary reasons I stopped playing that game was just how infuriating artillery could be to fight against)
2 Likes
Because vehicles can often do things they weren’t designed for. There’s SPAA that’s effective in anti tank roles, fighter/interceptor aircraft with large caliber cannons that are effective against ground targets and so on.
Big artillery guns are pretty good at damaging ground vehicles if they can be used in direct fire
3 Likes
And here is an italian M109L with the L39 fh-70 replaced with an Leonardo L52 cannon (the thing was supposed to be just a test-bed for the cannon so no other fancy upgrade)
2 Likes
Because WT is a virtual museum for military vehicles (in some capacity).
At least thats that, basically, BVVD said on QnA in relation to addition of more modern bombers (aka - at some point)
This are pictures of a T-80BV of the 86 UTP-56 GvOUTs LenVO in Sertolovo 96’
with the camouflage that we have in game “Dark Wave”
5 Likes
Hello, @Smin1080p_WT !
I’m sorry to bother you, but I have a question;
Earlier today, I tried to send a suggestion, but much like every I’ve ever made, it wasn’t accepted.
I was wondering if there’s any reason for this. I believe the suggestion to be genuinely interesting, as, for what it’s worth, have many hundreds of people so far on Reddit, and, as far as I know, it complied with all Forum and Suggestion related rules.
For reference, it was a Forum-format of this;
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1v835ly/suggestion_active_driver_camera_option/
Hey.
You can contact any Suggestion Moderator to find out why and for assistance on what’s required to make it meet the requirements: Who is who and Reporting Procedure
The multi mission launcher would be an interesting addition and possibly be useful at defending against helicopter cas. It is capable of firing fim92 aim9x and the agm114L (utilizing mmw) the hellfire is specifically able to Target both helicopters and ground targets
And the MML can utilize The sentinel radar that’s already in game and used by the NASAMS
7 Likes
14 Likes
What’s she called?
If you haven’t already messaged a suggestion moderator, feel free to message me. We only reject suggestions if it doesn’t properly meet the rules and guidelines.
5 Likes
Thank you, on it!