This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Read the title of the topic
I did , not the first time I ask
Gaijin make fun of us why would I read that
With infantry mode it is very well possible as a APC
Not an APC. It’s an Anti-Air Survey vehicle. It would act like Top tier AA and be able to spawn in 2 Flak 88s or 2 Flak 128s. I might make a concept for it because it would work very differently from the top tier SPAAs because the Flak guns most likely would be stationary, however the AA guns could also be towed to be moved around. But most Likely not because it’s already towing it’s radar equipment.
It’s a rare vehicle so it’s probably be premium, event, or squadron (hopefully not bp). It would tow a Kommandogerät 36
I believe it would be towed on a Sonderanhänger 52
3 Likes
Su-101 would be russian Ho-Ri that actually existed unlike that persons wet dream.
4 Likes
No. A target we can nuke.
1 Like
Would be a good concept suggestion (towable SPAA) bring the whole placement system in top tier to low tier.
Still the puller vehicle could become its own thing as they where used rarely as a battle bus
1 Like
This would just be more armoured SU-100P gameplay wise. Especially given that it’s gun is a development from D-10T.
Driver sits in the turret too but again the tank is made out of armour plates thickness of 60 or 75mm with maximum turret thickness being noted to be 110mm thick. This is nothing more than SU-100P that’s somewhat resistant to CAS .50’s and autocannons frontally. It has a 7,62 to pair but is also noticably slower it’s armor.
To be fair it’s mostly still just Gaijins fault.
The Prototype was mostly just wrong because of lacking information at the time. It was assumed the wooden mockup represented the final design chosen and a lot of guesswork was needed to model it.
For the Production, Gaijin rejected any real designs like the Ho-Ri II (the one we now know was the one actually under construction instead of the sloped design they added) because they wouldn’t fit the top tier at the time. Instead they requested a hypothetical vehicle to fill the BR, the same thing they did for German top tier and the reason the Panther II doesn’t actually reflect the real project.
They just blamed the consultant because it’s easier than admitting and changing their own faults, especially after that consultant was already controversial for other reasons.
1 Like
I feel it would start with 2-4 Flak 88 guns. You would have to stay within, maybe about 20 meters of them to control them. If you go too far away they won’t do anything. There should be a sandbag modification to get more protection for your AA, a 128 modification to replace your Flak 88s with Flak 128s and I think a radio modification that adds a Radio to the flak guns area would be nice (but only if the Sd.Kfz.7/6 has a radio to go with them). If the radio gets destroyed then that gun would stop firing and you would have to go to it and repair it. Irl I believe each flak gun was supposed with 400 rounds but that’s honestly far too many. I think gaijin should lower it to something like 200. Would be a fun and interesting vehicle to add to Germany!
1 Like
Please fix HVAP, it’s completely useless since it shatters every single time…
Man, this looks so cool. I wish we had more interwar period tanks for Germany, a sort of transition between the WW1 tanks and the 1930’s Panzers.
Tanks??? you mean tractors
1 Like
MIG-25BM, ARM/Bomber variant
and things like Mig-31, 31B, 31M, 31BM, 31BSM
5 Likes
AFDS (Autonomous Free-flight Dispenser System)
could be useful for nucleal thunder
3 Likes
sounds good
good luck making a post if you do that
1 Like
Would definitely increase survivability.
its not countermeasures
2 Likes