Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 3)

Yes, a viable suggestion on the forums as well as a possible addition in game. Although I’d say the likelihood of its addition is probably lower than other vehicles.

1 Like

a second opinion what missiles is this? https://forum-en-cdn.warthunder.com/original/4X/5/b/f/5bf358bf824af1731ebf98904743cb2f2d6c6e3a.jpeg

No clue, ATGMs aren’t my specialty sadly

ok, but how would you balance a tank that can go 130km without any protection but it has Korent/Milan/TOW ?

Vehicles of its type aren’t in game yet so we wouldn’t know (by this I mean small wheeled ATGM carriers. The Kornet carrier would the highest of them in BR, but where its range belongs I don’t really know. If I had to guess, maybe a TOW/Milan could find itself in the 8.3-9.0 range, while a Kornet carrier would find itself higher.

There’s a few similar things suggested for Germany but like… None have been added

Looks too small for milan

Mercedes go brooom

i thing its a Kornet or a Fagot

I went into this very debate a good couple months ago in a different thread, but the gist of it is this:

Yes, the 5-inch/54 Mark 16 was initially designed for service on the Montana class, but also for the CL-154 class, neither of which were laid down.

No, it is not enough for Montana to pass Gaijin’s rules, since the 5-inch/54 Mark 16 was only actually build for the first time, for the Midway class carriers, years after the Montana class was already cancelled.

The same goes for the Montana’s power plant, which remained on blueprints until after that class was cancelled, and only after that was selected (in slightly modified form) to serve on the Midways.

1 Like

Probably by its ability to avoid getting shot. If its faster and/or easier to hide than a conventional ATGM carrier with the same missile it would probably be at a higher BR.

There’s also variants that get other features to help them, beyond just mobility like camo nets to help them hide or smoke to reposition. These can also benefit a lot from scouting if Gaijin allows it like they already do on a few tank destroyers.

image
German Wolf (GD 250) with MILAN ATGM and fitted with camo net

image
Malaysian GD 290 with Metis-M ATGM also fitted with camo nets and 360° smoke launchers

image
USMC GD 290 with TOW ATGM and no special protection. Still interesting to see they had these

4 Likes

Maybe, most of nations have similar jeeps with recoilless rifles and ATGMs.

YES,i want cars with ATGM and RCR

final plans where written up for her and the secondary guns are in game. Her Anti-air will be second to non. Though people would likely then expect super Yamato.

I’m not the one who said it was a Milan, and I’d assume he means there’s multiple variants

Both alongside one of the H-class ships would be the largest ships we could get in game, would probably require bigger maps though

1 Like

not really the super Yamato is not that much bigger the H-class though big still can fit. You may run aground sometimes but the biggest risk to you will be your lack of anti-air (max twenty-eight 3.7 cm and forty 2 cm anti-aircraft guns) to your size unless Gaijin wants to do a 1945 - 46 what if which might be ideal. Aircraft with bombing computers can stay out of your 20mm spam your 3.7 would depend on the gun picked.

Should still be added for the its the biggest thing out there and hunter her in a aircraft of future sub would be fun.

The ship wasn’t laid down which is the main factor for it being added into the game at all.

Rule now is blue print for naval vessels though parts do help that is why super Yamato was approved.

It didn’t change.

Rule for suggestion and implementation are different

For now is still laid down

2 Likes