me too tbh, ain’t expecting a lot
A-7E late and A-7D later life modifications to the A-7s that allow it to mount AGM-65Ds, AIM-9Ls, and AGM-45 shrikes on the A-7D and AGM-65Fs, AIM-9Ls, AGM-45s, and AGM-88s on the A-7E
in game the A-7Ds cockpit radar shows that shrikes are a available weapon on the aircraft and no this isn’t a copy paste cockpit from the A-7E as in game they have their own distinct cockpits as well as this A-7D cockpit photo as shown by the shift set to the top left of the panel as apposed to the A-7Es UHF selector
as this would give the US a anti radiation missile around or just below 11.0 that a larger portion of the player base would obtain (looking at you AGM-122 on AH-1W) as Russia get them as low as 11.0 (both ARB and GRB) whereas the USs lowest BR ARM (besides helis) is at 12.0 GRB (12.3 ARB) on the F/A-18A
1 Like
Probably will be added when they introduce the T90M2 to the game
Still doesn’t exist irl…
It does exist…? what?
It doesn’t… They’ve yet to produce one
(You’ve been typing for like 15 minutes are you okay over there…)
Some South African stuff would be nice
Spoiler
Spoiler
2 Likes
Also would love to see this ingame for South Africa:
2 Likes
Could have sworn i saw something about a test version existing but i could be mistaken though “documents” say that it will enter production this year.
I was posting my own wishlist & doing other stuff irl, you’re not that important bro.
That’s what the Russians have said 10 are meant to be produced but nothing that have happened that’s proveable.
Luckily it won’t be too OP
6 Likes
Any help finding more info on this thing is appreciated, all I know is it’s a CV90 with a Kongbergs made turret
5 Likes
I’ve heard that before, but hopefully part of the recent discussions regarding “duplicate vehicles” has reminded the folks that a Subtree can’t just be a new flag slapped on a vehicle that is, for all intents and purposes, identical to the same thing in the US/German/Russian/British tech tree, it should also include researchable examples of vehicles that country was involved in developing.
Especially for the Patria variants, there are versions that were produced for market with nations that aren’t major or subtrees in the game, so I hope they can make their way to the Swedish tree, perhaps as squadron vehicles at the very least.
Yeah no lmao, with the animosity Sweden has and gaijins disdain for Finnish vehicles that’s just not gonna happen and there far more evidence to back up my claim than there is to generate any reason to assume Finland would get good additions that aren’t made to just generate profit.
The only thing gaijin likes is the Strv 122 anything else is left to rot. Besides other nations have made it clear Finland isn’t allowed to have their vehicles regardless of it the vehicle was made solely by Patria or not, see the Hitfact MK.1 and the Italy who claimed it because it’s their turret despite the vehicle being made and still sitting in Finland or the Rafael turret Patria being taken by the Israeli, or the UAE Patria with the BMP turret needing to go to Russia.
Its just not worth arguing when you’ve got 40 different people saying Finland can’t have their exports
2a7+ with its urban kit
1 Like
Yeah I’ve seen that type of opinion thrown around a fair bit and it’s really weird seeing people deny that the hull and/or turret of a vehicle being Finnish/French/etc, somehow magically doesn’t count.
I mean there was a weird spout when the Ito came out where some French players made a fuss that Sweden shouldn’t have gotten the Ito because it’s a French turret on a Finnish chassis
I missed that one but it seems like that would have been a pretty silly take
It wasn’t silly it was annoying but that sentiment basically never went away, again it’s not silly to assume Finland would get any export Patria. How many years has it been since the CT-CV105HP?
How long do we have to wait for a TT? Again the list for Finnish models that can go to the tree from Finland is small. If gaijin had plans to give sweden export models we would’ve seen it by now
