I mean it is the Norwegian CVs that fought in the middle east
French community is so powerful they can complain about a map before they are aware of it
Just to put into perspective how little sense that part of the leak makes, which also begs the question : are those leaks still reliable ? Cause they sure seem to have gone down in terms of reliability lately
13 Likes
Ahh never seen that image
You understand the leak is iffy when the most believable part is the paper vehicles limitline is extended XD
On a serious note, i agree with you that this hypothetical french “mains” gatekeeping an entire tank subtree sounds so odd…with air tree there was no problem at all…
Even gatekeep a map? Never happened before…
3 Likes
Do you forget how much complaining there was for that.
1 Like
The French community as described in the Leak.
22 Likes
i meant that the devs didn’t care at all about said lamenting, in comparision from that case to literally gatekeep a tank subtree to an air subtree already present is something that has yet to happen in all of WT’s history of 10+ years and sounds absurd if not borderline impossible, see what i mean?
the power of a community that can gatekeep something not even announced XD
1 Like
Where then does that put the Chinese community that seems have outright killed the Thai VT4 for Japan…
3 Likes
LS-6/100 or FT/Fei Teng series bombs for China. Similar to GBU 39/53 for nuclear escalation.
The French players need to stfu if theyre delaying swiss content
5 Likes
Apparently our eyes have been opened to the new bias’s nation of Warthunder, as per the Leaker
I kinda hope they include reasonable proposals that use existing components, e.g. the Alvis Stormer IFV pitches to the US LAV programme. Or the proposal for an L11 on the XM1.
Idk reasonable what ifs that consisted of technology that already existed would be nice.
Alvis Sagitar Concept, Bradley Style swing out twin tows and a L23A1 cannon
4 Likes
Larger bore cannon + atgm are fantastic, I’d love to see more.
I know of a few other British, French, Swedish, and Japanese ones, but the more the merrier
(Britain/India takes the cake with DRDO and Challenger street fighter)
or people should learn not to take leak lists at face value, especially when the leakers are being more and more vague with an increase in false predictions patch after patch
It’s entirely possible the leakers run with the info they had before Gaijin’s crackdown, which could explain :
- why reliability is going down
- the need for leakers to potentially make a diversion for past wrong predictions (like announcing swiss tree for early 2026)
4 Likes
Most if the time leak lists are wrong, so there is that. That’s a good point thanks
1 Like
Aviation (rank II ~ VII) and Ground vehicles (rank II ~ VI) lack the early squadron vehicle
Rank VIII none strike aircraft premium pack
Gajin not add the first premium (pre-order) pack ground vehicles to rank VIII for france tech tree
TBh if game is ever leaning towards paper tanks you could have T-64A with Strela missiles.
I know T-72 with 23mm autocannon and T-80 with 30mm autocannon exist (T-80 has photos of it and UVZ confirms T-72 with 23mm was made and tested)
I don’t personally have an issue with paper designs that were finished and can be added 1:1.
I just don’t trust Gaijin not to go for less complete designs they have to make up parts of, which is a really thin line especially considering there is still a lot of people that group anything from unfinished prototypes to complete fiction under the “paper” name.
5 Likes