Because vehicles can often do things they weren’t designed for. There’s SPAA that’s effective in anti tank roles, fighter/interceptor aircraft with large caliber cannons that are effective against ground targets and so on.
Big artillery guns are pretty good at damaging ground vehicles if they can be used in direct fire
And here is an italian M109L with the L39 fh-70 replaced with an Leonardo L52 cannon (the thing was supposed to be just a test-bed for the cannon so no other fancy upgrade)
Because WT is a virtual museum for military vehicles (in some capacity).
At least thats that, basically, BVVD said on QnA in relation to addition of more modern bombers (aka - at some point)
Earlier today, I tried to send a suggestion, but much like every I’ve ever made, it wasn’t accepted.
I was wondering if there’s any reason for this. I believe the suggestion to be genuinely interesting, as, for what it’s worth, have many hundreds of people so far on Reddit, and, as far as I know, it complied with all Forum and Suggestion related rules.
You can contact any Suggestion Moderator to find out why and for assistance on what’s required to make it meet the requirements: Who is who and Reporting Procedure
The multi mission launcher would be an interesting addition and possibly be useful at defending against helicopter cas. It is capable of firing fim92 aim9x and the agm114L (utilizing mmw) the hellfire is specifically able to Target both helicopters and ground targets
And the MML can utilize The sentinel radar that’s already in game and used by the NASAMS
If you haven’t already messaged a suggestion moderator, feel free to message me. We only reject suggestions if it doesn’t properly meet the rules and guidelines.