M2 Bradley Confirmed to have fired Raytheon Block 3/Coyote LE SR Drone
- The system itself is modular and can be tailored to fit reconnaissance, EW, and precision strike. Specifically, it can be equipped with a tandem-HEAT warhead to destroy heavy army targets at ranges in the tens of miles.
Is M2 Bradley more modern than M3 Bradley?
M2 is the IFV variant with less tow tube racks & more seats
M3 is essentially the recon variant with more tows & less seats
There’s some minor variance in later versions optics wise, but otherwise they’re identical
There is an M3A4 but afaik that’s an engine and electronics upgrade
Did US stop using M3 bradleys? I haven’t seen any news of M3 Bradleys getting upgraded like the M2 Bradleys.
It’s still around, A4 upgrade was in 2020 iirc
As Quartas said, it’s still around, its mostly just as case of the M2 & M3 being scoped down in roles by Stryker and the launch of the XM30 programme to replace both (the M2 & M3) by 2030ish. So we’re only seeing smaller upgrades & capability sustainment programmes rather than a larger upgrade programme.
Talking XM30, I really don’t get the whole idea of going for a non-bradley chassis? IIRC the AMPV, a Bradley based system, has only recently gone into full rate production, loosing that parts commonality seems a bit wasteful IMO
Are you sure that’s a real plane?
It never went past the wind tunnel model stage. You can consider this as a real plane.
sorry, I completely missed that.
New modification of the VBM, the VBM 30 NG:
- It will be armed with a new 30mm autocannon with airburst munitions developed by Leonardo, Spike LR2. ATGM’s, extended hull, Janus-D sighting system, new engine, and more.
Maybe different version of it? If it’s on block 3 there’s 2 before it
the difference is huge, can’t find any in common except they are missiles.
Coyote can be configured in 5 different iterations, one with a tandem warhead which comes to a point. Most images out are of Block 1 and Block 2.
Block 1:
Block 2:
Block 3 (LE SR):
Fired from helicopter.

Fired from Bradley.
- It’s a modular missile that can be taken apart for reassignment of missions. The missions entail: reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition; electronic warfare, precision strike, and
communications. The drone/missile can also be retasked midflight or if it misses its target, come back and strike it once more.
F-4G wouldn’t fit well in the game unless dedicated SEAD became a reality in game (introduction of ARM’s like Shrikes, HARMs, Standards etc), which would be cool. I’m all for more Phantoms in the US tree though, suggestions for F-4B, F-4D, F-4N, F-4E (1983 spec) promise some cool variation in the Phantom family.
In addition, we should definitely have the F-101A and F-106A (1972 spec) in game. Although the AIM-4 missiles wouldn’t suite the meta, both aircraft are capable of gunfighting, and a total lack of Falcon missiles in game is missing out on important early piece of missile tech history IMO, even if its bad in game. Also A-4M still not in the US tree even though Israel had the A-4N for years now… would be nice to have that and the A-4K (from New Zealand) in the UK tree
Are there other picture services? Because twimg does not work for me