M1 cattb
I-302
Rocket powered
Kostikov 302 Ko-3
Rocket + ramjet propulsion
Mikoyan-Gurevich I-270
Rocket propulsion w a modified dual chamber BI-1 rocket
and ofc the russian motorjets too
Mikoyan-Gurevich I-250 (MiG-13), motorjet for the Russia. - Suggestions / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum
Sukhoi Su-5
I want to see wack USSR experimental aviation, since the DB-LK, I feel like they are left out in that part.
10 Likes
https://www.scribd.com/doc/124412860/Soviet-X-Planes-pdf
There’s tons to pick from
I’ll probably get around to suggesting a lot of them, already did the Chaika with the Ramjets.
1 Like
This doc is crazy, not even 5 minutes in and I get flashed with ts
4 Likes
yeah supposedly the BI is supposed to have rockets and small bombs.
yeah, read that somewhere too, apparently the 6th one had ramjets also
BI-6 iirc
Yea man I hate those nations especially Uk so much which is why FGR2 is my most second played vehicle in this game.
In fact I went even further and bought Challenger DS, G-LYNX and Roiikat-105, those weren’t enough so i decided to talisman multiple British vehicles including Typhoon FGR4 and top tier Challengers 2.
I also think I hate Australia as much as I hate Uk so i decided to grind CRV Block-2 despite hating how events became on these days.
Never realised how hateful I was towards those nations until you brought it up, thanks for making me notice/s
Absolutely yes!! Any of these would be fantastic!
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Is that the reason why you were yapping about me bein potential Uk/Aussie and Canada hater?
So much for not caring/s.
Not as stupid as your points considering your comments on both Challenger 2 and Merkava 4, you still make me laugh I must say.
At least other people presented their faithful reasons and explained why they think those nations should be sub tech tree for Uk which I can understand it.
Meanwhile you just want those vehicles because you think challengers are suck and you cannot perform with them, learn the difference.
I’m starting to think you have massive comprehending issues. China owns Abrams in real life and their right to use it in game, Britain on the other hand doesn’t have any right to own Abrams unless Gaijin adds Australia to Uk under sub tech tree policy, dont confuse your childish demands with real facts.
No I just hate your childish behavior who acts like 5 years old kid who demands other people’s toys because he thinks his toys sucks. At least other people asks them for good reason unlike you.
Anyway this is the last time I’m answering to you so next time don’t bother me with your childish behavior.
Spoiler
okay so tell me what do you think is the better tank the merkava mk4m or the chally 2BN
okay so this is just wrong, if i thought the challengers sucked and didnt like them i wouldnt have over 1500 matches in the black night alone and i want the aussie abrams in the british tree to add more diversity to britain top tier and because the strong connection britain has with australia irl 1 of them being the union jack presented on the australian flag not because i think the challengers suck
China has the abrams through Taiwan, same as britain could have an abrams through Australia and im not demanding the tank at all? just suggesting it
“Demanding other peoples toys” or suggesting a new vehicle for britain top tier through a subtree nation that should rightfully be on britain and already has stuff on britain (the legacy and super hornet both good examples and the boxer crv)
and you’ve said this is the last time your gonna answer to me multiple times now but you just cant seem to get enough of my “childish behaviour” (you getting angry at me suggesting new vehicles because you dont like the idea)
Spoiler
I prefer solid armor with good APS while having decent enough mobility so BN suits me better.
Merkava offers better firepower and mobility but why would I go for merkava if those are my main concerns? I can just play my Type-10 which offers even better ROF,same firepower and better mobility.
You’re the one who kept claiming Challengers 2 are one of the worst tanks in this game, are you refusing to accept your own statements?
First you asked Canadian Leopards only and when I told you why not Aussie Abrams as well you didn’t want it, now you also want Abrams in Uk tree as well? Make a decision buddy.
Now you’re making sense but these are other people’s words, not yours.
Taiwan is also China, how hard is to understand? Didn’t your history teacher teached you this?
One is directly operating the Abrams while other one can only get its hands on through Sub tree, not the same case.
You weren’t acting like this up until other people stepped in and explained their fair reasons, now you’re just repeating their words which shows you don’t have single unique opinion on this.
What can I say I like to educate child’s like you even tho I told myself not to.
Anyway I think this message is clear enough, from now on you can reply as many times as you want or yap, I don’t care anymore.
I suggest read some history books, have some actual original ideas rather than copyin other people, have fun.
funny
8 Likes
Spoiler
thats completely fair.
because no matter how much either of us enjoy them it doesnt change that they are? if we go of the black night the aps is a nice feature dont get me wrong but its still got its other flaws
Worst top tier round (not by much but its still a factor)
Worst top tier mobility (other than the challenger 2E)
Worst top tier Survivability (along with chinese tanks)
Worst SUSTAINED rof (your ready rack does run out quick and doesnt replenish quick so yes this is a factor)
quite meaningless armor (other than the turret cheeks and the ufp against some vehicles your armour doesnt mean much)
this is not me saying its a “bad tank” but it is worse than the other top tiers other than the ariete obviously is it not? and im saying this as a challenger lover
if you remember correctly the original post was about multiple possible vehicle suggestions the main 2 being the abrams and leopard. i believe the abrams would be a better fit
australia is directly operating the abrams, australia is part of the commonwealth and king charles III is known by australians as the “king of australia” im pretty sure
am i not allowed to learn things from other people?
okay man talk to you again in a bit
we have been going at this since yesterday but im homesick so ive got nothing else to do and im actually enjoying myself but the spoilers there to not flood the thread
dw im aware, i just think its a little funny
its very funny, while your here whats your opinion on the british tt getting access to an aussie abrams
britain should’ve gotten aussie and canadian subtree in the first place, they’re both western-aligned commonwealth nations with a longstanding existing relationship with the UK. could’ve saved India for a Southern Asian tree or something similar.
3 Likes
britain getting south africa and indias subtree vehicles as a main thing instead of australia and canada is possibly one of gaijins WORST decisions with the tree it 1: makes britains air to strong if they get more indian vehicles (your looking at 1 tt with all 3 eurocanards + a su30 and mig29 not to mention we already have superhornets) and it makes the ground tree not that great, maybe the bhishma mk3 could be decent but the arjun is gonna suck, the only vehicle i might be interested in is the zorawar but even that probably wouldnt be to great
1 Like