Tbh a squadron wouldn’t even be that bad, just annoyingly long to unlock. But at least it wouldn’t be paywall.
Squadron vehicles would be great if the max research rate was’t so freaking low
2 Likes
Why cant we have fun things like the Il-2 with 200 bombs (2.5kg i thing each) or the Tu-2 with 88(?) machines guns in the bay?
1 Like
I wish we had more squadron vehicles. It’s automatically leagues better than completely locking away content, even if they take a while to obtain for free.
2 Likes
Agree, they’re a pretty nice way to add vehicles that don’t fit in the tree but are fun regardless
An Arjun tank prototype, circa 1987 (1 variant outta 6).
Weighed 52t and was powered by a 1100hp MTU engine.
The gunners sight on the right side and a commander’s panoramic sight, with a night vision camera installed above the mantlet.
good’ol 6x6 Mowag Puma with 320hp engine
(was) available in 20mm or 80mm flavors
3 Likes
First few images of China acquiring Russian KA-52s
https://x.com/VivekSi85847001/status/2049201082350641631
Gaijin When?
4 Likes
It’s fake
5 Likes
China would not instantly repaint a vehicle they got, examples being the Su-35 and 30MKK
And looking at other details, they just do not make sense.
Damn. That’s some good photoshop then
It’s AI tbh it’s easy to fake anything now unfortunately
2 Likes
Complete British tree reshuffle. Remove all the Commonwealth vehicles and move them into a dedicated Commonwealth tree. That way all Canadian vehicles are in one place, all Australian vehicles are in one place, etc. No more of this fighting whether or not these countries are “sub-trees or not”.
What British Rank I could look like without the Commonwealth. There’s plenty of vehicles available. This is also missing some still.
3 Likes
Humber my beloved
2 Likes
tbf, china did order some KA-52 at the tail end of 2023 IIRC
1 Like
We’ll see if they deliver
Complete British tree reshuffle. Remove all the Commonwealth vehicles and move them into a dedicated Commonwealth tree
Based
1 Like
I want to like Jarms’s post, but at the same time, I don’t fully agree. As well, I agree with making the UK tree just for itself, but I disagree with a commonwealth tree.
Between the 56-ish nations, which lends itself to a highly likely C&P only tree or more of the problem of India in the UK (NATO founder/Western nation with Russian/Eastern tech from another nation) or other forms of everyone’s stuff in one tree.
I do think the big 4 (technically 5, but one is a two-in-one) should be split up (mostly) as their own trees.
CAN-ANZAC, ZA-JO, and India, with the rest of the commonwealth split between them in places they properly fit if they don’t have a better home elsewhere.
1 Like
