I’ve always quite liked the design of Cockerills turrets, especially for larger caliber weapons. What’s that one Leopard with the Cockerill 105?
Those are copypaste so I don’t care about them, but sure I guess
Also filling 4th line would let us put the J-10s there (since they’re also used by Pakistan and also because why not), to avoid the weird mix we have in first line at the moment
The downside of a simple name is that it’s straight to the point, which gets it reused, as there are at least 3 LAV-AGs, at least from when I looked. That one, the LAV-105 Waffle posted, and the LAV-AG(1981) I posted.
Which is understandable considering the long form: Light Armoured Vehicle - Assault Gun. Which can easily be talking about any variant with a full direct fire gun.
2 Likes
Was always with this idea, when vt4 and abram t problem happened, i even proposed to replace high tier taiwan with Pakistan.
Bangladesh i dont know what is can offer tbh.
No its will be good for a 5th line. The tree is already in need of organizing the placement of some stuff. Bomber line can a good line to put stuff.
Placing all china tree in only 2 line is a really bad idea
1 Like
Nah north korea got better mig29
I really hope for the su25 and its insane loadout.
ye, def
3 Likes
GNSS and maybe IR or SAL or TV, its hard to tell
Of course we can use a 5th line, simply I think there’s enough room with 4 and a 5th line would just allow to make each line lighter. As far as my research led me to think, there aren’t really any more options for lower ranks to fill the 4th line if not a subtree.
As for top tier, two lines seem like enough to me for the various Flankers (J-11BG, J-15/15T, J-16 but also Su-30MK2 and Su-35) and the 4th line, even with the Pakistani jets, could still easily accomodate the Firebirds.
Now if you have more vehicles to suggest, I’d love to hear about them. I just haven’t found the need for a 5th line
1 Like
ehh, MK2 tbh wont be needed imo
I’ve seen many Chinese mains point the lack of ground attack caabilities of the tech tree sinoflankers, especially when the MKK was added as a premium, and they expressed their wish to get the MK2 as a tech tree equivalent. So imo it makes sense to add it as a filler until the far more advanced J-16 (which is a development of the Su-30s with latest Chinese tech)
1 Like
they could have made the MKK an MK2 for the TT and given the KH-38 etc if they wanted to tbh, plus, the MKK is missing a TGP it could carry
5 Likes
Oh absolutely, but it’s Gaijin and they didn’t. So what we’re left with for the tree is the MK2 which, at least, is the better of the two.
As for the pod, I’m not really surprised about this inaccuracy coming from them
1 Like
report was accepted a month ago iirc, still nothing sadly
1 Like
a month is nothing for this game, expect this to be fixed in a year if it ever gets fixed.
1 Like