I guess nothing. this isn’t a serious project, just something that makes the president happy, the image isn’t the final design
they don’t even decide how big it is, and they are going to use 6 years to discuss what it should be like, so it will end with nothing
3 Likes
we will see they too like there 3D models. There failed proposals some of them end up in there employee calendars I hear.
very possibly it’s just a model of DDGX, and added a fancy big railgun
1 Like
Skyranger Boxer
Gaijin add railgun
Where is this one from?
1 Like
It’s based on T-72AV chasee, you can see the turret of T-72A.
Also spot that had cannon at probably has no composites either.
Autocannons were 2A72, were stabilised and connected to one axle, making it so both commander and gunner can shoot with them.
The autocannons were stabilised as in “Техника и вооружение 8 2018” it is noted that Object 787 passed trials in april to june of 1997 with firing on move with autocannons, machine guns and unguided rockets and was deemed effective.
As the story tells the only reason it was not accepted is it was disclosed by design bureuo and hyped 787 in social media, which basically killed the fate of prototype.
So if it passed firing on move trials effectively it’s pretty much granted it can fire all of it’s weaponry on the move.
75/55mm Pak 41 auf Pz. Kpfw. III
Panzer III modified to carry the 7.5 cm squeeze bore Pak 41 firing APCNR
7 Likes
Hello guys! Need some help deciding which BR to put the Waran 4x4 with ZSMU 30/40
The vehicle specifications are:
Crew: 2
Armament: Mk 44S Bushmaster II, 7.62mm coaxial MG,Spike ATGM x2-4
Ammo: APFSDS (NM 225) 250-300 rounds (30mm), 1000+ rounds (MG)
Stabilization: 2-axis
Optics: GOC-1 thermal (Gen 3), laser rangefinder
LWS: Obra-3
Armor: 12.7 can pen it
Mobility: 4x4, max speed 100~110 km/h
Elevation: -12° to +65°
What should the BR be?
- 8.0-9.0
- 9.0-10.0
- 10.0-11.0
0
voters
3 Likes
I was trying to find him but I don’t remember his name. Some guy on TikTok who generates images of potential vehicles for in-game using AI. He’s done a few Polish, Ukrainian, Chinese, and German vehicles.
2 Likes
Seems cool, ngl
2 Likes
Azerbajian is at current date more NATO then REDFOR. Especially with it’s industry transistioning towards NATO equipment and NATO materials.
E.g. they stopped producing Russian military materials, e.g. explosives and metals and are revamping their industries towards the production of NATO materials and metals.
Azerbajian could be a very nice sub-TT for a Turkish TT - with Turkmenistan.
3 Likes
Why does any of that matter? And when has it mattered.
1 Like
You said:
But it’s not Soviet, it’s modern.
1 Like
Soviet is the tech tree
2 Likes
It could go either way honestly for Azerbaijan being a former Soviet republic or a close ally with modern equipment from both Israel and Türkiye.
1 Like
something something eggs
something something one basket
Spoiler
Grand admiral Thrawn would not approve
4 Likes