It absolutely is and I hate that because it just doesn’t fit and there simply isn’t enough room for India (they could literally have 4 lines in both air and ground easily). But eh Gaijin will be Gaijin so they will persist in this and ruin it like everything else, so whatever.
About Poland, some people made concepts of pretty big trees so maybe it could work standalone, idk though as I haven’t made personal research
2 Likes
For me Poland and Czech should come as a pack.
Would be nice to see them under Israel TT bc it has very strong relations with the czech republic, also israel its like the most empty TT rn, so plenty of space to make poland and czech lines.
Patria AMV with Rafael Samson Mk1 turret

We have quite a few remote control turret vehicles might as well add one via Finland and actually have a TT Patria foldered with the CV9030 FIN
7 Likes
Ironically these 2 nations make a bigger and more unique tech tree than Israel, maybe an Israeli sub tree for both of those in the future?
6 Likes
When making a concept tree for this I remember it being at least bigger than Japan’s
3 Likes
no & no , it’s own tech tree or part of a visegrad tech tree
small suggestion: can you add camo nets in the customization section for all vehicles (like on ‘wolfpack’ and 't80 U E1) for GE? though if they dont stop thermals seeing you (like currently on mt U-E1) then there is no need to put hem higher than 500GE.
Its a crime that, Centauro II variants are still not in Italian TT … whereas we already got a Hungarian 2A7 there … and have already got EBRC Jaguar and are getting Ajax and M10 Booker.
6 Likes
this is why i think gaijin has prejudices against some nations
1 Like
I want this new VT-4, but I haven’t been able to find any information on it other than it was allegedly spotted in Mongolia. Looks to have extra front armor, side armor, and slat armor on the rear, along with the APS from the VT-4A1. The turret cheeks look different to me, but maybe I’m mistaken.
7 Likes