Sorry but this wouldn’t hold up in court.
But if you can provide evidence it would be nice.
A neverbuilt:
This model was apparently built four years ago as an illustration aid for an arms broker who wanted to propose to the ROCA about importing surplus Stryker MGS turrets for mounting onto CM32 hulls as either an interim or an alternative to the Project “Cheetah” wheeled assault gun, reasoning that the larger hull should allow for, for example, better cooling equipment.
Nothing came of the proposal, and with the unveiling of the D3 prototype at TADTE 2025, I think it can be safely assumed to have been rejected and therefore not developed further.
3 Likes
What about NASAM
If we’re talking never builts:
Low profile Stormer chassis with a LAV-600 turret, a proposal for the AGS programme, never developed past the model phase.
3 Likes
ASCOD 105
Ascod + Rooikat 105 turret
8 Likes
The proposed Chinese combined gold coin package, with a BR (Battle Rating) of 8.7, includes two tanks and one SPAA (Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Gun),which are the
122 (Three-Fluid Prototype)
Spoiler
The 122 (TF) is an early power system design scheme for China’s Type 122 tank. It adopts hydro-pneumatic suspension, hydraulic transmission, and hydraulic control. Unlike the 122TM in the game, it is equipped with a dual 12.7mm anti-aircraft machine gun.
the prototype produced by Luoyang 704 Factory
Spoiler
The Luoyang 704 Prototype is an unidentified prototype housed at Factory 704. Due to the lack of a specific name, it is commonly referred to as the “704 Tank” with the factory’s name used as a substitute. It features a muzzle brake added to the muzzle of the 120mm smoothbore gun from the original Type 122 tank, an oblate-shaped turret, and a semi-automatic loader installed at the rear of the turret. A 20mm anti-aircraft gun is mounted on the turret roof — which, based on the time period, is likely an improved version of the Type 71 20mm anti-aircraft gun adapted for vehicle mounting.
PGZ-12
Spoiler
The PGZ-12 is a self-propelled anti-aircraft vehicle developed by China, featuring an 8×8 wheeled chassis and equipped with a 35mm revolver cannon, with a rate of fire up to 1000 rds/min
7 Likes
Komatsu 105 GSR would be nice to have
14 Likes
It wasn’t called Easy 8. It’s simply “(HVSS)” or “W/ HVSS”. I’d rather the HVSS be a modification than a muzzle break. HVSS wasn’t exclusive to the prototype “E8”, or the M4A3. Nor was it exclusive to any 76mm variant. Even the 75mm Shermans got HVSS.
Besides, we are still missing smoke launchers/mortors on the Sherman 76s. There is so much to do there it isn’t even funny.
It’ll go to 8.0 with a 20 sec reload. Idk if I’d even wanna bother having it modeled & added lmao. The current T29 without the rangefinder & advanced features got smacked with a fake long reload, might even go up in BR.
i was going off of the versions we have in game, not individual IRL modifications, otherwise i would’ve gone deeper into the rabbit hole
I can’t say a tech tree? Then just a two Canadian premium plane 😉 cbt
Like a Canadian Spitfire at low rank and a CF-188 at high rank that I would buy
1 Like
better with tri-hydraulic
SPAIN MENTIONED!!! This is a total victory
Very nice image
1 Like
early export model of the T-90S Bhishma that still has the cast turret from the T-72B
5 Likes
NGL, I’d like for Gaijin to finally remember to add that stabilized T-34-85 they said we were getting back in May when they announced the event for the Partisan.
Wouldn’t be surprised if they never actually add it though, since Gaijin does have a bit of a history with announcing things and then never adding them (Such as a chunk of the roadmap announced back in 2024 or whenever it was).
Spoiler for the purpose of reducing clutter
but yknow what would be real funny for Gaijin to add?
The T-34-62.
Was it used for static defence in Bulgaria only? Yup.
Does that mean it would work as a functional tank as well? Probably. The turret could spin, and most certainly could reload (After all, it wouldn’t be able to be used for it’s intended purpose.
That means it could drive if you wanted to put the work in to convert it from static to moving.
What could it look like in full form?
The most reasonable one looks to be this from over on WT Live, but the model below could also be viable.
Either way, it would be a sight to behold to see this absolute creature running around. Maybe 7.0 or 7.3? You’d have functionally no armor as the trade off, but you’d get basically the same mobility as a T-34 with the addition of HEAT-FS and APFSDS in return.
5 Likes
