serbian M84AS3
new serbian BTR mod
12 Likes
NGL, I’d like for Gaijin to finally remember to add that stabilized T-34-85 they said we were getting back in May when they announced the event for the Partisan.
Wouldn’t be surprised if they never actually add it though, since Gaijin does have a bit of a history with announcing things and then never adding them (Such as a chunk of the roadmap announced back in 2024 or whenever it was).
Spoiler for the purpose of reducing clutter
but yknow what would be real funny for Gaijin to add?
The T-34-62.
Was it used for static defence in Bulgaria only? Yup.
Does that mean it would work as a functional tank as well? Probably. The turret could spin, and most certainly could reload (After all, it wouldn’t be able to be used for it’s intended purpose.
That means it could drive if you wanted to put the work in to convert it from static to moving.
What could it look like in full form?
The most reasonable one looks to be this from over on WT Live, but the model below could also be viable.
Either way, it would be a sight to behold to see this absolute creature running around. Maybe 7.0 or 7.3? You’d have functionally no armor as the trade off, but you’d get basically the same mobility as a T-34 with the addition of HEAT-FS and APFSDS in return.
7 Likes
T-34-62 or T-34-115?
following the T-34-85, T-34-100 naming theme
I just use T-34-62 because it’s just a T-34 with a T-62 turret slapped on. And generally when you look it up, T-34-62 seems to pull more consistent results.
I guess you could do T-34/62, if anything.
Both seem to be accepted names for it, though.
So yeah, either name works. You can follow the gun size format and go with T-34-115, or go with a mix of the T-34 and T-62 for either T-34-62 or T-34/62.
1 Like
Fair enough
Belarusian Camo for the SU-30SM to grind or for GE
11 Likes
Sadly it wasn’t completed (about 90%), I remember when we asked @Smin1080p_WT about Re.2006, he said that it wasn’t possible to add, so P.133 is unlikely to come as well.
another chinese heli? no thanks
That’s odd, there’s a suggestion for the Re.2006, why wasn’t it allowed?
Suggestions have different standards, you can suggest even partially built stuff, but it will have close to 0 chances to be implemented, unless it’s a vessel.
About Re.2006 it was on the old forum, iirc he said that it wasn’t planned because it didn’t make its first flight.
1 Like
Isn’t that what he says whenever asked if a specific vehicle would be added?
E.g when asked about a certain L-39 variant for Germany
I’m pretty sure as long as a suggestion can be made, it should be a valid addition. It would seem odd to single out that plane in particular.
Nah, it was a different statement like “it won’t be added at all”, I don’t remember exact words and the old forum is not available anymore unfortunately. Although anyway plans as well as politics on different matters can be changed, so there is still a hope.
I’ve aligned an email about the plane (aswell as the F-111K) to Smin. I’ll let you know if/when I get a response.
1 Like
US
T68 40mm spaa
ww2
never entered service but they built it and used it in practice
internet:
(In practice the vehicle was far from satisfactory)
i think vehcile was light
but its good to add it to the game
MAR-240 multiple launch rocket system
ISRAEL
T31 Demolition Tank – Rocket Launchers and Flamethrowers
US
10 Likes
