In the real world where range, sensors and missiles are more important the J-10C is a great
However in War Thunders tiny maps where everyone starts at the same speed and altitude it will always suffer somewhat compared to the Eurocanards, Su-35 and F-22 etc.
1 Like
Irrelevant, pretty much all top tier planes would be higher with their full armament. Keep in mind the Rafale and Typhoon also lack the meteors and are limited to their medium range weaponry.
If it comes now the J-10C will not have PL-15
2 Likes
LuWa when???
8 Likes
What gaijin need to do is improve the performance of the PL-12 and AAM-4, they artificially nerfed both to be balanced in comparison to the AIM-120A, R-77, Derby, etc, but now that the 120C-5 and R-77-1 are ingame, it’s time to give both Asian missiles their proper performance since they’re AIM-120C analogues, not 120A. As for Israel they can give them the I Derby
3 Likes
120C-5 is mid, everyone just keeps using the 120A or B lol Only R77-1 is good
120C-5 is not mid, it’s better than 120A/B but only beyond 20 km + shots and also in rear aspect, 120A/B are better for closer ranges (bit faster to target and better turn), in jets able to carry both it’s good to take a mix of both, currently they complement each other, not replace
Depends on the vehicle. Personally i dont really care, i dont really bother with the C-5 because if you’re incompetent enough to let me hit you at 20km thats a skill issue. Again if the C-5 was a major improvement like the R77-1 id say yeah but thats really just not the case.
It’s because the base R-77 is so horseshit that the 77-1 is a significant improvement, meanwhile the jump from 120A to C has tradeoffs, as for dumb people, plenty running around at top tier, lil Timmies who bombed their way through the tree with F-4S or the premium Hornets with napalm in full downtiers are common, I often score kills at 30 km, my absolute best distance shot was in EC map, 69 km kill, 120C-5 launched from F-15I at mach 1.8
Honestly yeah R77 is pretty terrible but for some vehicles like the Su-34 its okay considering its good at really close ranges, (you could just use the R27s though lol)
Overall i dont have really any interest in gaijin buffing current missiles as it just becomes an even louder annoyance like when AAM-3 first got here (pre nerf). More so in the aspect of listening to an even louder group complain.
Also to add to this, gaijin either gives pitty and adds x nations unique missile for historical accuracy or balance or doesn’t add it because balance and theres plenty of missiles that weren’t added because they were better than the missiles of other nations.
1 Like
We need BMPT
1 Like
So this is an early AMX 50 with the 120mm TOA turret
The amx 70 is a more armored version of the amx 50 surbaissé or surblindé unfortunately there are no known picture of the prototype but it was a beast.
On the picture is the dar my prototype of the amx surblinde but again i’m not sure i’ll have to Check my books.
Also there were a third version or the amx 50, equiped with the TCB turret without an autoloader. It was actually built and it would be the truc équivalent of the m103.
There a load of amx50 missing in this game, it saddens me as a French motherfu**er.
ooo that thing looks awesome, who’s the developer? also whats the max speed for this? the track configuration is unique i wonder why they decide to make it like that
Its IABG’s Air-Transportable Weapon Carrier/Luftbeweglicher Waffenträger(LuWa)
Supposed to be a demonstrator for a wisel replacement
afaik there’s not many details out, but that might just be a language barrier thing, my german is a thing of the past
1 Like
more fire tanks LOL
flammpanzer 2 flamingo or flammpanzer 3 would be cool
or L3 with flamethrower, there’s also the british bren universal carrier armed with flamethrower and piat
however fire need some adjustments, these tanks are supposed to be very strong irl but their range is their biggest weakness, if you could set trees on fire or houses it would be even better but fires in most games i’ve seen are handled poorly and they usually cause lots of fps lag for some reason and same for detailed smoke particles, as a counterpart firefighter vehicles with the water cannon could be added or some police anti-protest ones, fire seems like its not causing as much damage in war thunder where as in real life it’s very deadly for tanks, ive seen a ton of footage where most tank destruction and explosion are generated by small fires caused by drone impacts, the extinguisher kit should also be only 50% effective and vehicles engulfed in flames react to water so that amphibious vehicles can use an alternate way to survive
1 Like
Now multi-vehicle systems are a thing i suggest it’s time for the M1/M116 75mm Pack Howitzer in its original self propelled form.
2 Likes