no, no … I didnt mean that.
Anybody can post anything … that was not the point I was making.
My quip was regarding that it being :
i.e ~ it being mostly a same’ol Leo 1 platform but spruced up.
no, no … I didnt mean that.
Anybody can post anything … that was not the point I was making.
My quip was regarding that it being :
i.e ~ it being mostly a same’ol Leo 1 platform but spruced up.
Ahhh well technically the turret is new and the leo 1 body will be shiny at least
You still really believe ?
in my own dreams, i believe
iranian upgraded t-72 for Russia as a reward for a event
(as an iranian i say iran should not be subtree of Russia)
More Strv m/42 variants would be very much appreciated to see.
Personally, I wouldn’t mind seeing either the 2B1 Oka or 2A3 Kondensator, just for the funny.
Yes, the gun alone is twice as long as the Abrams and the Char 2C, and the reload is abysmal, but come on. Imagine how comical it would be to bonk some poor fella with 16" HE as they round a corner.
Would much prefer it be something other than a BP vehicle though.
With the Indonesian Mi-35P on the way, would be great to see the Indonesian Rafale which was already built, to be added as Japan’s 14.3, it’s a Rafale B so a 2 seater, which would differentiate it from the French one, even though yes it’s the F.4 standard, so once Rafale F.4 is brought to France, this could come too, it would be a tad heavier and therefore marginally worse but 2 seaters are cool
Anything to get more two seaters in game, also the Indonesian Rafale camo looks nice. It’s a simple grey bicolor, but it works well on the aircraft
128v128 but its on a simulator map in GRB would genuinely be fire
The Rafale is 1 of those jets where 2 seaters look great and pretty much just as good as the single seaters, it looks really integrated, like the 2 seater F-15s
would be cool to see the F-15EX and F/A-18E added to the us tree’s to account for 4.5th gen aircraft with esa radars
Can see the Mi-28 can carry 8 LMURs. What is the source for this?
All images and documents I have seen including combat footage show no more than 4.
If an Mi-28 could carry 8 why are they not flying with 8 unlike the Ka-52M when they have been seen with maximum Vikhr payload.
Would be good if anyone can share this or if Gaijin has likely once again played with the truth to stop Russia falling behind?
Most of the equipment currently in use often flies with minimal weapons.
LMUR is a large missile, and as I mentioned we have seen fully loaded Ka-52s with Vikhrs during the tank hunting phases.
I would like to see a source or image showing 8 can be carried.
I haven’t found any photos yet, but I can provide you with an Mi-8. (this will take time)

Those are single launchers not dual, but appreciate the efforts
IAI Barak MX Land On the Move. Pending
![]()
While the Barak MX Land On The Move is noted to only use the Barak MR/MRAD and LR/LRAD, the brochure of the MX system says the launcher can use all 3 mentioned missiles, one of which is also the Barak ER. The ER, due to it’s huge power, has to be fired in a deployed/stationary status. All launchers can carry 8 missiles (aside from the MR/MRAD specific launcher, which can have 4 as an option).
All interceptors of the Barak MX system are compatible to be launched from the BARAK land-based launcher.

Anyway, for the specs for the missiles:
Barak MR/MRAD:



Barak LR/LRAD:




Barak ER:





For its radar, it can use either a less powerful ELM-2138 radar, or a ELM-2084
ELM-2138:

ELM-2084:

