yea agree
Please quote the section in the War Thunder rule book where 2° of depression “isn’t enough for the game”. We are more unlikely to see the M110 in game, because the only thing it has over M55 is RAP shells (which would have limited functionality in game) over “too little gun depression” (keep in mind, several Russian vehicles have 3° of depression, so I guess 2° is the limit huh?)
ah, you mean -2°, I thought minim is +2° based on the image. then maybe enough
Yes sorry, I should probably be a little more clear in my sentences, sorry for the hostility. The M110 isn’t a super tall vehicle, so I think the -2° should be an ok amount. But again, RAP shells were more for distance, I’m not sure how they would perform when slamming into a tank at a distance of like 200m, but I guess we could find out in game.
Wait a second when did this become real???
Hungary, Romania, and Poland are all apart of different nations as opposed to the USSR. There’s precedent for former USSR nations to not be affiliated with the USSR tech tree. Once again, the implementation of new vehicles in the game are based on filling gaps and maintaining an as semblance of balance across the tech trees.
So,
what I found,
M107 (175mm) has M116C sight for direct fire but RoF is 1 rnd per minute
M110A2 (203mm) has M139 direct fire sights but RoF is 1.5 rnds per min
2S7 Pion (203mm) has OP4M-87 sights for direct fire but Rof is 1.5 rnds per min
2S5 Giatsint-S (152mm) OP4M-87 sights for direct fire but Rof is 5 rnds per min and can fire BP-540/3-VBP1 HEAT shells.
Apparently was shown in the practice for republic day on 26th jan, wow i didnt know about this.
Thanks for making me aware
Yes the reload is problematic too, I somehow forgot about that. I’m trying to find a velocity on the M650 HERA shell, no luck so far.

ZTZ-100 for me
LAV-700

It’s a LAV-700 C3030.
LAV-700 is the whole class of vehicles (the armoured carriage beneath the turret).
Currently doing more research on this, a prototype for the modernisation of the Polish Su-22m4
It features a modernised cockpit, a podded radar station, Litening targeting pod, GRIFFIN laser-guided bombs, RBS 15 Mk.3 anti-ship missile, and Mk-83 bombs.


Thank you for the clarification.
The airborne one with ATGM’s would be the better option for IFV

(No reason they all shouldn’t be added, this one would just be better in WT)
both is good no?
Well in terms of WT a IFV with APS and nothing but a 30mm is mediocre as hell, be a neat pseudo SPAA because of the radar tho
But as I said there’s no reason all 3 shouldn’t be added


