Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 2)

isnt a lot of stuff based on US stuff or developed with American help?

You might want to update that, IIRC they settled on the APG-82v1

i mean there could have been incremental upgrades to TEWS and the RWR for strike eagles.anyways, they recently got EPAWSS so now USAF F-15 have the best radar and ECM/RWR of all the F-15

i think the F-15K has different CFT that can take guided weapons on outer stations but they were probably tested on a USAF F-15E so may be able to get them on it

1 Like

2S23 Nona-SVK

photo_2025-04-25_11-27-12

12 Likes

It’d be awesome to see the Nona in game, the BMD platform was great. I’d also wish to see the BMD-1 and 2, but probably won’t ever happen.

1 Like

I think it will happen, just way down the line. They’re pretty iconic vehicles, it’s just a matter how they get implemented i.e. Premium or Researchable. I hope it’s researchable, not the BS like with the BMD-4M.

2 Likes

Yoo i need thisssss

The K1, K200 and K55/K9 are based on american designs but their later variants are vastly different in performance making them distinct.

However South Korea offers a lot of other systems which of course use some western designs principles but is built on their own expectations like the K2 BP, K30/K31, AS-21, Tarantula, K808, Tigon and more.

That depends on Gaijin. South Korea has a lot of unique domestic/foreign modified vehicles, of course from rank I till III you still have Copy n Paste however after that it’s all unique stuff. So it would definitely not just be Copy n Paste till top tiers.

Still the US isn’t in any state for the need of a subtree and South Korea has too much potential to just become a sub.

I wasn’t aware the US was in need of foreign F-15/16s, they definitely should have South Korean models instead of the later variations of their F-15/F-16 model.

Aside from that. Thailand uses a lot American designs as well and still has been placed in Japan even though it has some better aircraft, yet i heard nobody mention this.

2 Likes

LAV 6.0, cougar avgp, M113 Tua
lav-iii-upg-pa01-2016-0139-004
lavcougarAdolphe1

9 Likes

Tank Destroyer Based on Type 05B


5 Likes

The hull is 05B, and I think it’s not AFT-10.
similar length but much thinner(AFT-10’s box is from 300-400mm wide and ~2m long).
size similar to Spike NLOS(1648 mm × 234 mm × 310 mm )
this means it should have a much longer range, 20km if with optical fibre, or even reach 30km without optical fibre.

8 Likes

Nice, I appreciate the inputs 🤙 I’m not too knowledgeable on PRC vehicles

1 Like

PLZ-07 and PLL-09 with additional float tank armor.


image

3 Likes

BMP-3 w/ Arena APS & Additional Armor

5 Likes

T-64BV w/ Zaslin APS


images

2 Likes

17458297714137386673165018731019

2 Likes

4 Likes

Seems like HJ-13 ATGMs

What is that?

much larger than that. after all it’s still 2m long.
HJ-13 has round tube, means its wings are folded into the missile, while square box means the wings are not folded inside the missile.