Mind sending some? I’ve never heard of that or seen any evidence of it existing other then paper ideas
God damn that’s ugly and have you considered erm bridge
looks better than the Puma, bridges aren’t always available ;)
That’s a lie and bring mobile bridge systems
This thread provides the documentation I found. It’s not photographic, but we’ve seen stuff get added on pure paper documentation before.
Not enough for gajin unfortunately
How so?
They often don’t believe documents like that unfortunately maybe you could try suggest it but I don’t think you’d get anywhere unfortunately maybe they’d accept it and that would be nice to see along with a gas turbine jagdtiger
Soviet captured Bulgraian Panzer IV
4 Likes
If the implication but this is that you think it’s a Subtree, or that the Italian tree is home to Spanish vehicle, that’s incorrect. Spain doesn’t exclusively belong to the Italian tree, it’s not a Subtree. If that’s not the implication just ignore me, just making sure no one has the wrong idea about it is all.
adding the F-4D and F-4B would fit roughly 7 of these bullet points
Spain should’ve been Italy’s subtree imo.
Then we could’ve had some sort of Romanian, Bulgarian, Hungarian (and maybe even Yugo) mix tree, that would’ve been boss.
why tho? The Soviets are not in need of a 4.0 medium tank.
Also the Panzer IV is way too copypasted already
this again…
2 Likes
Wow more useless copy and paste for a nation the especially doesn’t need
Clearly the soviets need all the Sherman’s panzer 3s and 4s and panthers and tigers and king tigers and whatever else
2 Likes
a friggin’ Maus as well! - how dare ye ignore
+M109, Chieftain, Magach, M60, Bradley, Abrrooms, Leopard 2A6 …
/s
We need all the captured German equipment
2 Likes
Actually clueless because it’s not needed it’s copy and paste slop none apart from. You and the 3 other people who want the least unique trees ever at least ask for unique stuff that used ex German equipment like su76I
3 Likes
🤷♂️
1 Like