As I said. 9M I dont really consider that meaningful of a difference given the vehicles already at 11.7. Not just ground attackers like the A-10C but also F-15As, Mig-29Gs, Su-33. Etc etc.
2x extra BOL i also dont consider massively impactful either, as I quite often run A2G on those outer pylons in GRB anyway.
Then the T10 also gains the advantage of a more powerful engine.
As I stands, I think the Sea Harrier FA2 and Harrier Gr7 should be 11.7 and the Tornado GR4 (and SLE) should be 12.0 in GRB.
Bug Thunder is also here. Half my C5s in an actual match miss because they just flip out. Even with clean launches (fired at the intercept point) that would have been totally fine before.
The amount of aoa that missiles now pull was fine on dev for me, but since it now hit live (commonly known for spin/server issues) I can very much expect this to be true.
I believe it would be a massive improvement to have Nuclear Escalation use a rotating BR bracket system like sim instead of just standard BR matchmaking. If I get uptiered I’m just going to leave, why would I spend an hour or more just getting stomped for no reason?
I still see no reason why its 12.0 and not 11.7 in GRB given the aforementioned differences.
It should be judged on its A2G performance which is 100% identical. Given just how little we have for A2A at 11.7 and what we face. FA2 and GR7 would be a much welcome buff with our 11.7 lineup