Next Major Update "Sky Odyssey" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Ye

basically


https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/QDBqDUzzl9ur

Ask Smin why they did it, likely Rafale was the only focus, it’s why the AJ37 didn’t get RBS, top tier is the focus

Gonna bug report that
mirage2000eg472mc
Nobody will keep Exocets away from my boy, seriously Gaijin the only job the Mirage had was manly anti-ship, and on of the reasons the Rafale was chosen was for a plane to keep carying the Exocets

5 Likes

he predictably ignored it

You can bug report it but like Smin told us it’s not the focus, it doesn’t mean it can’t get in in the future but it’s unlikely to be added this major

I guess they wanted Israel to have a top tier ASHM carrier more than anything else

i wonder how late the devs start working on major updates

Night before

I still dont see it at 12.7…
Like, current state, move it to 12.3…

Any news of F-14B(U) HUDs?

We technically have F-14B(U) already but, HUDs are still same as F-14A and regular B model.

so we have:

  1. FK-2000 denied its 16x missiles cause the Devs dont wanna
  2. J-16 and J-10C being stuck with Targo cause the devs dont wanna add the HMD they modeled for china to them ??

ohh and dodging everything regarding the PL-12

3 Likes

I imagine they work on several updates simultaneously. Whatever is ready gets packaged into an update and released.

(This may explain the ‘plans may change’ thing, as well)

I can’t imagine them waiting until one update is released and then scrambling to work on the next one before an uncomfortably close deadline xD

like smin said before the additions of vehicles is planed around 1 to 2 years ahead
in that time alot of stuff can change

a good example is the H145 that was in the files for around 5 years

1 Like

I don’t think we will get an answer or a change regarding this

1 Like

"Nothing currently to report on. Still under investigation.”

They did give an answer?

Can I have a link?

1 Like

So, sweden and france and the us got the old air launchable variants of their respective anti ship missile from the 80s meanwhile the soviet and japanese trees get mid 2010s ones

Whats the rationale there? easier to find info on the older systems or?

Dont get me wrong. not much would change. the ranges are never large enough that it makes a difference and seeker quality isnt a factor in game. im just kinda curious

You just answered your own question

1 Like