there is a difference between using a patent as a source for something in service
and using a pattent to claim something is functional
explain how any of those are “well informed”
10/10 attempt at moving the goal posts
still 0/10 reading comprehension
didnt even bother to see what started the conversation
projection at its finest
i called out your claim on the patent somehow proving that it is functional which is simply not true
yes, you successfully moved the goal post hence the 10/10
but still clearly do not understand the initial argument hence the 0/10
you should already know, they work, they are used, they have been shown.
your problem is the technical compability, not the existing rack.
Brother you guys have been gimping china with filler SPH and deadzone spaa for 3 to 4 updates straight
i meant “goes”
1 Like
F15ex, and later on the F35b behind the AV8 I would assume
EX could be after C though due to its mission.
probably going to be F22 there
@Smin1080p_WT is there any reason why the italian Giulio Cesare has worse fire rate on the exact same guns?
5 Likes
More like Philippines. Two Koreas are sufficient to have a larger tree than Israel, but doubt their tree will go below Rank III, just like Israel
Sun will explode before you convince these people.
1 Like
Mmmmm, more t62/Patton spam.
Exactly what the game needs currently.
Ron is right here, the context of the argument you had with Code and Ron was whether or not the AMBER racks were functional in a yes/no binary answer. Then you changed it to say that the Amber racks were “more functional than others” in a comparative way which wasn’t done before.
1 Like
My tree pick is Yugoslavia. And yes, definitely more than sub trees at this point.
The reality shows thats its irrelevant. Hell you are playing this game, look into cockpit of WW2 planes even those flying for hours over featureless sea. Nobody had issue even in days of paper maps and sextants
Stop the cope that somehow degrees are special.