We don’t have any current plans for that, but again, perhaps in the future if there is a need or greater desire.
Would the Devs ever consider introducing an Air RB variant that removes enemy markers to mimic SIM battles? Granted, this would require a major overhaul of the current spotting and rendering mechanics to be viable, but it could bridge the gap nicely between the two modes.
The SEAD events were fun because of that.
1 Like
Combined Korea + Philippines + Vietnam would be a pretty good techtree honestly. That way there’s enough to let it start at rank 1 across the board which also allows for some of the lower BR Korean (mainly North Korean) vehicles to enter the game.
2 Likes
yepp. Looks about right
1 Like
extra strut holding the tank for extra security
2 Likes
Is. It. Functional?
No?
Then best case is still 16.
I’m sure you have examples…
again
that is not the standard that has been used for similar systems
why do you think US planes need to be held to stricter standards on weapon options than other nations
Can’t wait for another nerf because of gaijins modeling
Name the systems?
It’s exactly the same reason why it was denied before that
dual amraams on EFT
dual pl 12 on J15
extra r77s on early flankers
and many more examples of fictional loadout options, which have much lower levels of evidence for feasibility than AMBER
so while there are loadout options that dont exist, have never existed, and have no evidence for feasibility already in game, you are arguing that a proposed option that has a patent show its functionality, and has been mocked up as a loadout option is too fake to be added
70k rp buff, watch gaijin do it
same pylons as for the dual ir missiles
same pylon as on J-10
same pylon as on the Su-35
so there is very much a difference between those and the amber rack
Functional pylon to launch
Also functional
Still functional
Something being functional … is added? Whether or not it’s technically compatible with adjacent airframes (for the last two especially) is always highly debatable
and yet this hasnt been done ILR or proven to be possible
completely different aircraft with completely different avionics, with no sourcing for that as an option
see above
prove it
and never mounted or even proposed as an option
you cant even show these as mounted
again cant even show these as mounted
last time i checked, no F15C has been seen with dual rack aim120 equiped. even tho its compatible.
The pylons are all functional, which is more than what can be said of AMBER
(Wrongly) arguing whether certain aircraft are compatible is a completely different topic
patents show that AMBER is functional
and no the pylons are not all functional, eg. the dual amraam pylon on EFT has not been shown to be compatible with any non IR missiles
hmmm, maybe if you want to claim I am wrong you should post some proof of their compatibility
oh yeah, you cant because they are incompatible
so everything that was patented once can be added to the game
great idea
did you read the second half of that?
and yes there have been MRML racks mounted on stations 2 and 8 of at least 1 F15C, and orders for more MRML racks by the air national guard for their F15Cs