4 billion jet dev blogs next week. I’ll be happy if we see Danish F-35 or ETS
Pretty sure it’s way too early for that
Doubt we will be seeing em at least within this year
Am I the only one getting this error?
I’m not getting it
Why? We already have F-35 WDNS just not named correctly
1 Like
Was thinking of a different F35
Mine seems to be fine
1 Like
I just need it to complete my fav lineup (US 10.0), And its cooler than the 2k imo
Yeah I don’t really care about 5th gen right now, I’m just looking to get a solid Draken for 9.7 which is pretty unique
Still vexed gaijin won’t fix the name
3 Likes
A35XD?
sentence
That can be said for a lot of vehicles…
Scorpion 90 next week :cope:
We didn’t call it that in service both the WDNS and F-35 were just called F-35 by pilots and ground crew
The XD and such is the name of the original Draken that was made specifically to the request of our airforce
Once in service we called them by what they were F-35, TF-35, and RF-35.
We don’t call the Gripen A by it’s prototype name
Well ye
Draken round up and discussion again? Hell yeah
Not as cool as the Sabra though.
Not really, that time had a lot more discussion lol
That thing looks ugly and is worse
@Smin1080p_WT
Hello there, I wanted to ask something. A year ago, a report was made regarding an issue with the AN/SPG-51 tracking radar found in the USS Charles F. Adams, Lütjens and the USS Forrest Sherman. The report explained that it was impossible to lock nor track any air vehicle with it, so I was wondering if it would be fixed for this incoming major update
Here’s the link to the report: Community Bug Reporting System
1 Like
True, but every great convo must have a beginning