Next Major Update "Sky Odyssey" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

No, one was hinted at for this year I believe but not specifically for this update.

1 Like

I think it was a potential, as were wheeled vehicles for Russia, AMX-30c2, and an APS equipped Leopard for Germany, but wasn’t a explicitly for this update

why is everything so shiny now?


1 Like

They ran out of tarmac for the runways and all they had on hand was acrylic tiles.

4 Likes

its like those realistic minecraft shaders where everything just gets wet

Free dlss 5 for everyone

image

12 Likes

In all seriousness they messed with the reflections of the airfields in the dev server somehow.

Not the weirdest bug in the current dev server though. For me it’s the big bombers being able to ram other planes and take little to no damage.

Very fun to mess around with in the test flights you can just slice them apart and you’ll maybe lose a propeller.

1 Like

You mean like you?
Nothing you said had any worth either.
Your complains were a non issue everyone has to deal with.
You not being able to understand physical limitations is the main issue.
Followed by you completly overexagerating the issue. Its still good enough for 14.3.
Its not like it was a 14.7 plane to begin with

I answered to the context about your own simply complained, context wise you should have questioned your own thoughts and decisions.
Again not my problem you decided to go brain afk

Yak-28B is about to become the greatest interceptor ever if this stays like this.

2 Likes

I have tried it but it seems that just the big bombers work for this.

When you collide you just detonate in the Yak-28. Same with other twin engine bombers. Only real success I have had is with the B-17’s, B-29/Tu-4, B-52, and Tu-95.

Tu-95 is the best for it since it’s surprisingly nimble for such a big bomber.

1 Like

Unfortunate but not surprising. Still hoping the new DMs get more work because its current implementation is just not it…

Yeah they massively over tuned it IMO, makes sense against lower calibre guns and some canons but when you have the B-17’s surviving being hit by Fakours and half the A-10’s ammo being dumped into it then it’s getting too extreme.

@Smin1080p_WT Can we expect to the the Lightning 3 TGP added to the F/A-18E this patch?

The report has been accepted for awhile now, and currently the TPG available takes up an AMRAAM slot.

Report linked: Community Bug Reporting System

1 Like

Gaijin is allergic to Italian helicopters unfortunately, they were talking about expansion of the TT, but since when we’ve only got a few Hungarian copy Hinds…
And suggestions area is full of possible helicopters to add:

As for the top tier helicopter, especially because they don’t introduce MITL feature, I think the best new addition would be AW149, it can carry JAGM and from what I’ve read has DIRCM.
Then AW249 of course)

Yeah against missiles, ap, and aphe rounds they seem incredibly overpowered they should not survive the ammount of missiles they do at all. even focusing fire on where crew are or engines with ap and aphe rounds do concerningly little damage. against he rounds they seem decently tuned tho maybe a bit overtuned (vid of either a 20mm with he rounds or a 30mm with he rounds german plane against a b-17. seen claims of both). I really hope the bombers get tweeked to be better cause rn its waaay overcorrected.

they should be a reason to take ap/aphe rounds when u want to intercept but not tank giant 40mm+ aphe shells or missiles

audio, coloration etc added post video was recorded obv. but yeah, HE hits directly to the back of the engines dont do much. but a hit with a round that would reach it or one with much more explosives (like a missile) should absolutely shred it.

rn it just looks like they watched a clip like this from ww2 and went purely of that

@Smin1080p_WT has any work been going on to get the IRST pod working for Super Hornet, and potentially adding them to F-15C GE and F-16C PoBIT?

Looks like all AGM-88G bug reports about its velocity being incorrect are being labeled as “Not enough info”, even though the manufacturer advertises it as faster than its predecessor (AGM-88E and similar variants). Do we just accept a super-modern missile with improved kinematics not having improved kinematics? Like, obviously, we are not gonna have a data sheet with the exact kinematic profile of a brand-new weapon.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/e1qkEPU1Fsmg


3 Likes

I hope one day 40mm bofors 3p is added to the cv9040s a saphe with proxy fuze would be so much fun.

tried to add it as a suggestion but it got sent to the shadow realm as it vanished without even a message of it being deleted xD

You’d need to ask a suggestion mod why it wasn’t accepted, it’s always been that way