after the livestream they said…
“Cum” just means “with” in this context, but “haha, funee sex thing”
1 Like
Penetration Cumulative Blast
slightly underestimated BR
Giving it AIM-26B would increase its BR too much, and earlier versions of AIM-4 are actually better than AIM-4F/G in most air RB situations
Part of me wants to assume this was named without any thought to this, the other part of me is just feeling surely someone had to look this up before naming a product. We are just too interconnected a species to not have had someone decide to double check their work, surely.
Would have to see how it performs at 9.3 with just two missiles
Do any of you still seriously think the bomber DM changes are “okay” or “realistic”?
1 Like
how?? its just like an early aim-7 and we already have aim-7 at 9.0
2 Likes
When is the changelog gonna be live? Same time as dev server?
My reaction to flying a worse J35XS at the same BR because the devs say we wanted it without flares
7 Likes
Bombers are better overly survivable than flimsy as they were prior. More refined solutions to the problem could have avoided this, but they chose not to, so here we are.
J35J tho. So we got something neat even if it is just mostly a copy paste vehicle ive been wanting it for ages
absolutely great i will be able to finally fly without getting killed in 10secs
1 Like
The joys of BR compression
Or just lazy modelling, take your pick.
1 Like
That seems like a problem with proxy fuzes lol
But yes, that’s a bit extreme
dev open btw
More like the joys of not getting special air bias like the US since the XL gets countermeasures and the F-5C also has them
3 Likes
Which could have been addressed with a more refined approach, but alas.
1 Like