Please report any texture bugs here: Community Bug Reporting System
You can use the CDK or vehicle spesific options:

![]()
Please report any texture bugs here: Community Bug Reporting System
You can use the CDK or vehicle spesific options:

![]()
Uh, probably gonna wait a bit so XL will be avalible for bug reporting, but thanks
While on the topic of textures, the AIM-120C-7 on the claws actually says AIM-120C-5 on its model lol
Because technical compatibility only adds a basis for a weapon to be added, it doesn’t mean it will be added, it just can.
`+ @joshje100
I don’t recall these, any examples?
Nothing has been skipped. You have a personal preference and that’s ok to have. Its an established fact that blogs after the trailer are less impactful than those before. Many of the vehicles shown before the trailer are naturally the ones of less impact, that would otherwise get less attention. Showing them after the trailer and after the major reveals impacts them even more. So there is little to be gained there from doing it as you suggest.
Putting all the blogs after the trailer also means significantly longer waits until anything can be shown to people for the next major update. Which is going to lead to even more people being frustrated. Since the trailer and dev streams are towards the later parts of the seasons and cannot be brought forward.
The only one I can think of off the top of my head (although no longer relevant since the addition of the GBU-53) is the F-16C Block 50 and the F-15E are technically compatible with the Spice 250, yet that addition was denied.
I can’t seem to find where it was rejected so I can’t really say if that was because “they didn’t have them” or not. If they added Spice 250s and were planning GBU-53s, it wouldn’t be surprising if they just held off on Spice 250s till the GBU-53s.
Israels air tree starts at 3.3 br wise
Can’t see why Greece can’t start around the same br either
They should first up radar the Block 50 to V9
They are mistaken as Spice-250s require integration, it’s marketed as compatible as the platforms are one that are meant to be able to be integrated with it seamlessly. These are not aircraft that you could strap it to and could use it by default without any sort of software updates.
Regarding LJDAM for the A-10C it isn’t even a case of technical compatibility it was actually used in combat and pictured numerous times on the aircraft.

While yes it doesn’t always mean it will be added for the case of the A-10C it’s missing an integral part of it’s mission loadout and a very useful one at that for in-game.
I can agree on that, but I wouldn’t say the devs are inconsistent on Tech.Compat because they didn’t include everything, then NATO would just all have MICAs.
or, heavens forbid, USA aircraft receiving a foreign weapon after it’s been integrated and tested on that aircraft for another operator.
(Looking at you, F-35s)
Is this about the Meteor?
Last update was extremely boring until the teaser dropped, I’ve got hope for this one
Not just the Meteor, but yeah.
Get your own BVRAAMs, USA :P
Then a mistake. I was thinking ground one.
Agreed!
Leopard 2RI, M1A2 SEPv3s, M1A2 SEPv2 (Trophy), T-90M (Arena)… I was bored as hell until the Teaser and Dev Server showcased these!
And I know I can look forward to this update because Staff members said, that “nations that aren’t getting modern MBTs this (that) update, would be getting it on the next (this) one.”
C2 ariete and EMBT is all i want, Please gaijoob
Ground starts at 4.3 not 5.7
As you mentioned before.