@Pheonix_RX01 doesn’t it have the same autoloader as all the others? so 7.5 secs to him too?
1 Like
Does it not use the same autoloader?
Hm, well then, is there a brochure or image that shows the 5s reload for the XC-8?
Btw do you have any docs for the multi wheel turning function on the Patrias?
nope
Cockerill man says so and I believe him
1 Like
guess it might be accurate then?
that post is kind of the Saint Graal for cockerill so i doubt he putted bs in it
1 Like
trying to find sources for it but they LOVE leaving out the RPM
1 Like
as always XD
He also said this
3 Likes
Yeah there’s that mention of stress reload times which I’ve seen before
1 Like
same, guess we got the answer then
Hey
Nuclear Thunder is currently the larger scale maps in testing that incorporate much of this. Beyond that, its not possible to say at this stage.
2 Likes
I wonder if we’ll ever see 5s, but that would also mean (if that happens) its possible for the Type 10 to do like 3.3 or 2s (heard rumours) when in an emergency
Any chance you could pass these?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/k8LngXLri9cj
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/mmREeO56oiyj
Sounds to me like there’s no counter argument then to having mica get smokeless motor.
i appreciate the reply!!
But knowing Gaijin, they’ll apply it to only one and not the other, like they did for the MICA EM seeker buff.
So if only one is to get it, then the Aim-120 should be the priority
That’s if there’s no balance consideration on the part of developers. In the developer’s eyes, they may see everything as equal, especially with the new buffs, and as such the smokeless motor should first be given to the lowest impact situations so it can be evaluated before giving it out like candy even more.
Even with these changes. MICA EM and R-77-1 will remain the strongest missile, as range still remains one of the least important attributes until the seekers also get buffed.