Next Major Update - Rumor Roundup & Discussion

Great point.

So you don’t know how such a mode would work yourself?

It’s almost like tanks can’t really attack ships and only interact with coastal boats to a very limited degree, while ships could annihilate tanks with cannons or missiles.

There is no point in having a mode with tanks and ships at the same time, either you have tanks fighting tanks or ships fighting ships.

You can’t have tanks fighting ships.

How are you going to make sure that the tank players could even play the game without getting nuked or completely annihilated by free CAS?

More importantly, what are you going to offer as an incentive for players to even spawn in tanks in NE?

The FCK-1C could become a truly interesting aircraft to add in the future—even though this suggestion has been around for years. Taiwan has been developing a new gallium nitride (GaN) AESA radar

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

New HF-3 anti-ship missile,
This new missile flies at Mach 3.5 at sea level.

Spoiler

image

Spoiler

Spoiler

It would be great if Gaijin added some truly unique vehicles not just for Taiwan, but for other nations as well

According to the CSIST, the new radar will be more modern, utilizing GaN technology, than the APG-83 found on their F-16Vs (more modern in terms of information processing and computing units though not necessarily more powerful in terms of detection range)

3 Likes

Wonder if Irish Churchills would be considered for a neat named premium version of the Churchill, maybe like Ḋiarmuid

Aaaaaand in no way quantifiable in war thunder

I support this. The mode is Enduring Confrontation with nukes anyways, so just draw a huge line on the map as well

1A6 to 9.7, equipped with DM23
2(A0) to 10.3, equipped with DM23
2A4(C) to 11.0, equipped with DM33

2A7 to 13.0
PSO to 13.0 and left lane, also just model the hull composites its been a while “muh the release nodel had dozer” i do not care we are not at 9.0
2A7V to 13.0

Alright fair enough, I was wrong on that one.

As event vehicles… and their pack premium AH-64 was removed afterwards too. Completely different lol.

Girl what…

1 Like

Better engine, uparmored Leopard, .50 cal. Compared to 2A6

No reason to keep it at 12.7 if a decompression happens. More if it gets the hull extra armor fixed

Its not uparmored ig tho. They refused to give it the additional plates like Strvs have.

Have you considered the 2a6 is just a 12.3 lmao 🤷‍♀️ there’s no difference between it and 2a5 apart from 20mm pen

really?

2a6

PSO

looks about the same to me

now if gaijin fix this Community Bug Reporting System then yea PSO can go to 13.0

3 Likes

Yes that is the second part of my claim. In general still better aemored than 2A5/2A6

OK but still the vehicle would be closer to 13.0 if it gets the missing plates. Would be better than M1A2 SEP, for example

What is incorrect for it. Getting the TVMs and 2A6EXs would just be better. The PSO isn’t a 12.7

1 Like

Half the 12.7s aren’t 12.7 worthy.

Like quite a few 12.0s are 12.7s

Gaijin can’t balance shit

2 Likes

I mean for the Swedes, since they dont have a gen 5, although gaijin may make a case for the Saab 2000

IDK if Korean vehicles in the Japanese tree is too sensitive just add the Polish version to the…hold up