Is that real?
You a suggestion mod right ? Can you suggest the AGM-86C Comventional Air Launched Cruise Missile?
There’s also multispectral smoke (basically chaff for ground vehicles).
1 Like
Meanwhile, the irl B-52:
2 Likes
I wish there was a laughing reaction on forums.
2 Likes
IDK if it can direct fire but the krug is indeed capable of throwing 150kg of HE at mach 5
1 Like
I could, but I’m not going to. My main job is dealing with player-made suggestions, not suggesting anything that I think should come.
Belgian F-35s with GBU-53s. Would put them the same distance behind everyone else as Israel & USA, but who cares. Suppose that goes for Japan too most likely.
The humble Tu-95 proposes a challenge (and Tu-16 now with nuclear missiles!)
1 Like
But now that we know it’s possible to restrict weapons to a mode (or atleast within a mode depending on BR) it’s possible for MmW to be added but restricted so it doesn’t cause any problems.
Still wouldn’t know when to deploy it in fairness.
I don’t think we should get MMW for GRB (just make them obscenely expensive with SP) but they’re pretty needed for NE imo (Gripen and EF2Ks are lacking)
I have a very vague feeling that that’s not happening. They’re really anti-MMW :P
Yes Gaijin, I want to fire all 16 Brimstones in Mode 3 at the Su-30SM2 MCMing.
1 Like
Yeah as I said only APS and Cover are in game right now. There’s that smoke ofc, other and newer APS systems (better angles, more charges, better reaction speed, etc.) and I think automatic smoke dispensers? But I’m not sure if that takes advantage of a LWS or something similar to a MAWS.
3 Likes
Actually, I want to give many counterexamples, such as Israel’s F16C/F16D F16I not having AGM-65, the UK’s SEP V3 not having M829A3, J16 can be compatible with KH-29 and KD-88A but not with KH-29 with a KD-88A seeker head, and so on, there are really too many of these, so your theory is totally unfounded.Of course this is compatible, but then, why not release it? Could it be a balance issue? I want to remind you, right now both the F-16I and F-15I are still at 13.0, while the American F-16CM and F-15E are at 12.7.
what else should we talk about? (i still cope for CM today)
Hurling a rock at an MBT to blind it
1 Like
Bruh there’s more aircraft in game that get mmw, and even then the gripen and the Ef2k are not really lacking at all
I don’t think it’d be at such a BR. A T-1 with missiles can probably sit at 7.7-8.0 BR comfortably, but without them the armament is very limited. It’s only one machine gun, or three with heavy gunpods that take the space of ground attack/fuel tank options.
Personally I think it’s best that the T-1A, which has the most powerful engine, would be added with the missiles. This way the best performing T-1 can be the one that sits at the higher BR, where it can be comparable to the Sea Hawk Mk.100 but with much lighter armament (and because of that 0.3-0.7 BR lower).
Then I think at a lower BR they can add a T-1B with the lower thrust J3-IHI-3 engine. At a ~6.3-6.7 BR it could be a useful light strike aircraft, carrying a limited set of conventional weapons on a decently fast aircraft for the BR where there is still a lot of prop aircraft around. If it needs to be a bit faster against early jets they can also add the T-1B-10 with a bit higher thrust J3-IHI-7B, or it can simply be another aircraft at a slightly higher BR.
3 Likes
you’d have to have quite a throw to convince it that a rock is a missle
All that furious typing on the forums has given me quite the gun arm