That or the F/A-18XT would be great options for a twin-seat Super Hornet for the US
Although the F Block II (and other twin seat versions of other aircraft) would make for great filler additions foldered under their single seat versions.
5 Likes
WT Mobile 's Halloween event starts on Oct 27th, and today they’ve released the event tease image:
It seems the ship will be a Tegethoff class, which would make it the second austrohungarian ship to appear there first.
2026 has seen many ships from nations not yet represented in WT 's naval roster appear in WTM, in addition to those two missile ships making the jump from there to here.
4 Likes
The plane is the Pucara
The tank looks like the AMX-10M
1 Like
Yeah, but I didn’t need to mention them here since WT already has both. Unless they use the Pucara to introduce MCLOS missiles to Mobile w/ the Pescador ( unused here ), which is 105% purified cope.
1 Like
I just thought to mention it, as the AMX-10M may not be obvious to people
In your original question to Smin, you asked for a F/A-18F but not a specific block.
I do think the F/A-18XT would be super cool though. I don’t know if the Block III actually changes anything for in-game performance.
*Also have to imagine that if they add a better version that is a two-seater (but has a single-seat equivalent, eg the Blk3 as a two-seater) then it might cause issues with other community members that the “better version” has a worse FM than the “worse version”, if that makes sense.
I’d love to see more two-seaters generally, hence why the XF-2B is what I chose for a TT F-2 Early in my Japanese Air Tree concept.
2 Likes
PLEASE no
EX fits the current top tier, RMP would be a disappointing sidegrade
The Block III Super Hornets basically just have a big MFD in the cockpit, LITENING TGP on the centreline pylon and are able to carry the new long-range air to air missiles being tested.
Ironically the Block III (unless they ever add the new missiles in testing) would be worse than the XT even though the XT is what ended up becoming the Block III.
@Smin1080p_WT Hi Smin, sorry to bother but i’d like to know if there are any plans to a give camo net research modification to more tanks like the M1A2T and other abrams variants (taking the Sep V3 in game as an example).
I’m asking because i think it could be a nice addition to give the choice to players in case they want to research and equip a camo net or not.
2 Likes
Day 1341 of waiting for Polish tech tree
4 Likes
I think we can deduce that the EX won’t come this update since the GE got moved up to 15.0, and the EX would have a better radar and engines. Hope I’m wrong.
1 Like
Cool boat
Theres always a chance that new aircraft get added above the current BR cap
how dare you extinguish my hopes and dreams with reasoning
but I still have some hope, the only difference would be the engines and ground attack if they don’t give it the extra missile pylons. radar won’t make much of a difference if gaijin keeps giving every radar the default 60ish km max lock range
Happens somewhat frequently for new variants of vehicles, not always feasible to bring everything to production.
Fairs, but I doubt the answer would’ve been different either way. I guess we’re just gonna mish mash again aren’t we :/ Seems there’s always a reason not to add a two-seater.
Not true. There are other aircraft way better than the GE at the same 15.0 BR (pretty much anything that can look behind it + better FM). They can still still easily add it to the same BR to complement it as an alternative
J-16 got added after J-15T was already at 14.7 (top br).
5 Likes
They also have the Type 053H DDG, which means mobile gets China naval first, which makes sense since theyre already getting a lot of DDGs but Im still salty
gaijin really can’t help themselves, immediately compressing top tier every time they do a major decompression the very next update.
I am excited. Yippee.