you said that they are the same
also the Mig-25
MiG-29 as well
The guy is just a bit special.
have you seen the intakes on the F-14 and Super Hornet?
they are also square
Holy moly
You’ve opened my eyes
Even the Tornado has the same intakes!!!1!one!!!
What sources do you have for the engine’s thrust to know it has 0 installation penalties?
He made bigger and more relevant claims that I would focus on, he’s saying the J-16 has zero thrust installation penalties. Is that normal? Does the J-16 have different intakes than the J-11? Does the J-11 have zero thrust installation penalties?
he just knows
it came to him in a dream
just like the information that the J-16 and F-15 intakes are identical
Surely I won’t find bug reports claiming that the thrust for those planes is wrong as well
And they definitely won’t have the same reason for rejection as the ones for the F-15s
Spoiler

Day 1324 of waiting for Polish tech tree
I would like to see some proof FROM from gaijin or someone defending this that they used real math and didn’t pull something out about the -22% thrust when installed and that J-16 isnt over performing
bro you are claiming its wrong, burden of proof belongs to you
also where does this -22% number even come from
it also belongs to you since you decided to say that f-15 isn’t underperforming and that J-16 engines are just fine
-22% comes from what pw website says the unistalled is vs what the stat card says in game
never said that i made fun of you for saying the intakes are the same
never said that either, you are claiming they are wrong prove it
also uninstalled != installed thrust lol
- -22% would be them overperforming
Spoiler
its prolly wrong but you still have to prove that
no it should not equal the same as actual experts which you guys keep saying are not experts say a good engine and intake system should be closer to -4-8% nowhere near 22% now where is your proof ?
a negative loss by definition is a gain
-
see first line of post
-
you still have to prove this applies to the F-15
-
you still have yet to prove the J-16 is overperforming