Reporting the “not a bug” veredict by misinformation didn’t work…
It’s funny how they claim that Arjun’s bustle rack is the most important and convenient one; yet, if you load the amount of shellf of the bustle, instead of filling up the bustle, it fills up the turret floor first WHILE LEAVING THE BUSTLE HALF-EMPTY.
Why can no technical moderator or developer see how little sense this makes and just how contradictory it is to their own statements?
The EMBTs were disappointingly implemented with F1 (and the French one behind TWO unfoldered Leopards and backed up by underperforming Leclercs), Arjun was implemented with a ready rack bug that reduces its survivability, and 2HEL, while nice, is backed up by a lineup of underperforming vehicles.
Regarding the previous update, the new Abrams tanks, M829A3 and turret ring fixes are nice, but SEPv3s’ underperforming hull armor was disappointing.
T-90M Arena is cute, but still feels the same as every Russian tank has since 2020.
Funnily enough, I would have been WAY more satisfied by the previous 2 updates if most of their additions hadn’t been implemented in a disappointing way.
-If the SEPv3s had received a minimally sensible hull armor (at very least 1990s-standards level)…
-If the SEPs had received their confirmed +250% CE turrets vs M1 (only SEPv3, which should be even more, got this).
-If the EMBTs had received at least DM53 (I believe it’s about time for DM63 already as well)…
-If the French Leopards had been foldered to make the grind to their EMBT viable…
-If the Merkavas and Namers had been finally fixed to be worthwhile backups to Leopard 2HEL…
-If the Leclercs had been finally fixed to be worthwhile backups to EMBT…
-If Arjun hadn’t made it with the ammorack bug, or if at least the devs had the intention of fixing it…
Etc.
I am only in a permanent state of looking forward to the next update when the previous one has been disappointing xD.
