Next Major Update - Rumor Roundup & Discussion

[KhorneFlakez1337]

They obviously have surplus resources to hire new devs that work on infantry, right?

Instead of hiring people to work on infantry, they could have hired people to work on existing modes.

Regular ARB, GRB, Sim, Assault, etc desperately need to be improved, NE is half-baked, naval has been a sinking ship since it was added, a lot of the time they add new mechanics, those mechanics are left in an extremely basic form and never expanded on, etc

The chances of infantry ending up like naval are pretty high, especially when looking at Enlisted

[oom1992]

@EpicChicken22

For the next major update, what do you think would be added, and what is the main focus of the update?

@AydanL44_Hunter

So uh, what do we expect next major update?

My idea future content

• New APFSDS for Leopard 2A7, Challenger 3 TD and EMBT

• The first american light armed helicopter

• Sikorsky H-34 with armed for researchable tech tree

• The first USMC attack helicopter

• The early attack helicopter with guided Air-to-Ground munitions from US Army (inferior to AH-1F)

• de Havilland Venom & Sea Venom from foreign operators (RNZAF, RAN, Flygvapnet and Swiss)

• Domestic RAF de Havilland Venom night fighter variants

• SNCASE Aquilon early variant

• The Royal Navy de Havilland Sea Venom with Air-to-Air Missile

• British night fighter low tier (rank II)

• The 1st gen British Aerospace Hawk from Finnish & Swiss

• Licence built Canadian Sabre from RCAF (to 8.3 ~ 8.7)

• The RCAF & SAAF jet trainer with armed and light attack aircraft since 6.3 ~ 7.3

• P-61A Black Widow for researchable tech tree.

• Douglas A-4 another variant for USA (US Navy & USMC) and UK (RAN & RNZAF) tech tree

[KhorneFlakez1337]

@oom1992

RNZAF

???

What is it with you and New Zealand?

[joshje100]

@KhorneFlakez1337

Instead of hiring people to work on infantry, they could have hired people to work on existing modes.

So long as they are actually separate teams they should be fine to work on infantry. Yes there are some areas that could do with some more resources (like all things cockpit modelling) but overall I do think infantry will add a lot of opportunities to WT.

If you want to talk about a waste of resources just look at Aces of Thunder.

[KhorneFlakez1337]

@joshje100

infantry will add a lot of opportunities to WT.

A lot of opportunities to miss lol
Like, even when I try to be optimistic, their track record really crushes that optimism

@joshje100

If you want to talk about a waste of resources just look at Aces of Thunder.

That I will 100% agree on

[oom1992]

You not wrong 😀

But I read from this suggestion

United Australian, Canadian, New Zealand Aviation Tech Tree

poll [image] Special thanks to @StormRyder13 who collaborated with me on this project Introduction Let me start this post by stating this: In the researchable tree of this suggestion we have 28 domestically designed aircraft, 79 domestically modified and/or built and/or unique to the operator nation aircraft, and 11 of the so-called “copy paste” aircraft. The events/premiums section adds a further 6 unique aircraft. So with that in mind, what is the suggestion about? There are a great many …

[Code_649]

@KhorneFlakez1337

What is it with you and New Zealand?

He’s TheKiwiThunder

[Deathmisser]

@Code 649@live

Missed the announcement where you spoke for everyone

Always love how people do that, it make them sound so big when in fact they’re usually small : P

[KhorneFlakez1337]

Spoiler

[ItzMikeyzWRLD-psn]

[KhorneFlakez1337]

I don’t think that post worked

[joshje100]

[Code_649]

I hope India gets some representation in the researchable air tree soon.

I ALSO hope that it goes like this in preference of additions:

1. Domestic designs (e.g., Tejas series)
2. Domestic modifications of exported aircraft (e.g., Su-30MKI)

And, as a very last resort, exported (or C&P) aircraft if aircraft before it lacks anything that can’t be filled by #1 or #2 (e.g., Rafale)

[KhorneFlakez1337]

India can get its turn as soon as they finally add some more SAAF planes

[Deathmisser]

There defo space for them but depends whether or not gaijin has the balls to do it, it would also give Britain around 3 new top tier jets but I wouldn’t have any hopes until 5th gen tho

[Code_649]

You will take your Gripen and you will be happy

(Jokes aside, I’m not familiar with SAAF, what other planes do they have?)

[racimazzedine]

Su30mki, the most overrated plane in WT

[Code_649]

Plug and play Su-30SM with Indian/Israeli avionics? What could go wrong (or incredibly right)

Last I heard they were fiddling with AESA + new engines.

[joshje100]

Now that Gaijin have figured out how to have a horizontal scroll bar there is pretty much unlimited space in the TT’s, just need them to work out how to add a 6th line now.

[Deathmisser]

So overpowered that gaijin is scared to add it as they fear it would ruin the game for the Russian player base. Therefore Britain should and will expect it’s own Typhoon