I don’t want infantry either, it’s a waste of resources
1 Like
Would still be nice to have but not necessary to have before 5th gens. Although the F/A-18XT would be a nice option to have in between.
Same with other “stealth” 4.5 gens like an F-16C/D Block 50/52 PoBIT with Have Glass V modelled or the F-15SE (as an unfinished prototype but failing that F-15E1).
1 Like
Doesn’t make sense since you’re not personally in charge of development? What does resources have to do with us? Let them deal with it lol
Can we please get rid of MCM. Genuinely such an awful mechanic
2 Likes
Unlikely. It’s an intended feature within the game.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
They obviously have surplus resources to hire new devs that work on infantry, right?
Instead of hiring people to work on infantry, they could have hired people to work on existing modes.
Regular ARB, GRB, Sim, Assault, etc desperately need to be improved, NE is half-baked, naval has been a sinking ship since it was added, a lot of the time they add new mechanics, those mechanics are left in an extremely basic form and never expanded on, etc
The chances of infantry ending up like naval are pretty high, especially when looking at Enlisted
1 Like
My idea future content
-
New APFSDS for Leopard 2A7, Challenger 3 TD and EMBT
-
The first american light armed helicopter
-
Sikorsky H-34 with armed for researchable tech tree
-
The first USMC attack helicopter
-
The early attack helicopter with guided Air-to-Ground munitions from US Army (inferior to AH-1F)
-
de Havilland Venom & Sea Venom from foreign operators (RNZAF, RAN, Flygvapnet and Swiss)
-
Domestic RAF de Havilland Venom night fighter variants
-
SNCASE Aquilon early variant
-
The Royal Navy de Havilland Sea Venom with Air-to-Air Missile
-
British night fighter low tier (rank II)
-
The 1st gen British Aerospace Hawk from Finnish & Swiss
-
Licence built Canadian Sabre from RCAF (to 8.3 ~ 8.7)
-
The RCAF & SAAF jet trainer with armed and light attack aircraft since 6.3 ~ 7.3
-
P-61A Black Widow for researchable tech tree.
-
Douglas A-4 another variant for USA (US Navy & USMC) and UK (RAN & RNZAF) tech tree
2 Likes
???
What is it with you and New Zealand?
So long as they are actually separate teams they should be fine to work on infantry. Yes there are some areas that could do with some more resources (like all things cockpit modelling) but overall I do think infantry will add a lot of opportunities to WT.
If you want to talk about a waste of resources just look at Aces of Thunder.
1 Like
A lot of opportunities to miss lol
Like, even when I try to be optimistic, their track record really crushes that optimism
That I will 100% agree on
You not wrong 😀
But I read from this suggestion
He’s TheKiwiThunder
Always love how people do that, it make them sound so big when in fact they’re usually small : P
1 Like
I don’t think that post worked
10 Likes
I hope India gets some representation in the researchable air tree soon.
I ALSO hope that it goes like this in preference of additions:
- Domestic designs (e.g., Tejas series)
- Domestic modifications of exported aircraft (e.g., Su-30MKI)
And, as a very last resort, exported (or C&P) aircraft if aircraft before it lacks anything that can’t be filled by #1 or #2 (e.g., Rafale)
3 Likes
India can get its turn as soon as they finally add some more SAAF planes