People (US & German mains) would rather have the good vehicles for themselves.
Well, other nations get “unique vehicles,” and then they are just vehicles with the worst traits of things already found in the tree, made worse.
It’s a wonder why the one nation with a unique sub-tree is more open to “C&P” then everyone else; maybe it’s because being unique doesn’t automatically make it good
F/A-18C+ with APG-79v4 when
so why not a 3rd one that they just artificially limit to not have fox-3s just like the swiss premium hornet
ahh I see🥀
does this radar have more RAM
no it’s smaller GaN radar to fit in legacy hornet, no RAM coating
you can play soo many instances of doom on that bad boy
GaN? in this economy?
It also says 1000lb of bombs but in game it can carry 2000lbs, thats because Greece used on the Helldivers, F-84G, F-84F, F-86, Dakota and the Spitfires NAPALMS (homemade ones)
@Smin1080p_WT quick question given the T-34 on Finland is just a common model would the version with the pepper pot muzzle be a modification for it or would it be classed as its own thing?
It tested Finnish made ammo along the KV-1, and T-28 so I have no idea if it falls under new vehicle suggestion or like modification suggestion
Specifically shown here which vehicles were asked to be modified as the muzzle brake also changes ammunition velocity.
On one hand, true
On the other, both models are ready now, there was no F/A-18D when Switzerland got added
or gaijin just adds another premium Viggen
or a premium F-16 would also be an option
So many options for copy paste premiums
More likely MLU 1 but Smin already stated no more Hornets are planned for Sweden
So, @Smin1080p_WT what are the other sources that were used for that Sabre then?
Wikipedia lul?
Cuz the greek AF page has some very dubious claims on there.
but i think that gaijins high tier CAS plane for sweden is the JAS-39D
I suppose that’s better than nothing lmao
F-2A ADTW with AAM-4 when
(Su-30 spam at 13.3 is annoying)
JAS39D comes to mind
We have a range of internal sources gathered by our team. I grabbed the most obvious public facing one to showcase the point that we currently have no perceived bug to “fix” as you put it there.
You are more than welcome to make a report if you have information to the contrary.
And no, we do not use or accept Wikipedia as a source.
