Aaaaaand in no way quantifiable in war thunder
I support this. The mode is Enduring Confrontation with nukes anyways, so just draw a huge line on the map as well
1A6 to 9.7, equipped with DM23
2(A0) to 10.3, equipped with DM23
2A4(C) to 11.0, equipped with DM33
2A7 to 13.0
PSO to 13.0 and left lane, also just model the hull composites its been a while “muh the release nodel had dozer” i do not care we are not at 9.0
2A7V to 13.0
Alright fair enough, I was wrong on that one.
As event vehicles… and their pack premium AH-64 was removed afterwards too. Completely different lol.
Girl what…
Better engine, uparmored Leopard, .50 cal. Compared to 2A6
No reason to keep it at 12.7 if a decompression happens. More if it gets the hull extra armor fixed
Its not uparmored ig tho. They refused to give it the additional plates like Strvs have.
Have you considered the 2a6 is just a 12.3 lmao 🤷♀️ there’s no difference between it and 2a5 apart from 20mm pen
really?
2a6
PSO
looks about the same to me
now if gaijin fix this Community Bug Reporting System then yea PSO can go to 13.0
Yes that is the second part of my claim. In general still better aemored than 2A5/2A6
OK but still the vehicle would be closer to 13.0 if it gets the missing plates. Would be better than M1A2 SEP, for example
What is incorrect for it. Getting the TVMs and 2A6EXs would just be better. The PSO isn’t a 12.7
Half the 12.7s aren’t 12.7 worthy.
Like quite a few 12.0s are 12.7s
Gaijin can’t balance shit
I mean for the Swedes, since they dont have a gen 5, although gaijin may make a case for the Saab 2000
IDK if Korean vehicles in the Japanese tree is too sensitive just add the Polish version to the…hold up
They can get a f35. Actually 2 f35s lmao 🤷♀️
Just expect every day to have news for the most part. We are in dev blog season.
No, this is wrong

