= you + ego = people
2 Likes
Have they? I don’t think that’s necessarily true about 1 unique vehicle minimum
when a vehicles made for a specific country its obvious, Shir 2 for Iran, the K2NO for Norway, the Philoctetes for Greece they are variants of already existing vehicles that if they get added they wont be missed from the mother-country as other variants of the same vehicle exist,
that just a plain OPLOT that they copy paste the wrong model, in other hands the Turkish trial T-84 was a unique variant made specific for Turkey
1 Like
Why do they dislike China, Israel and Sweden so much then?
Unique Planes
VL Pyörremyrsky | War Thunder Wiki
VL Myrsky II | War Thunder Wiki
Héja I (Italy) | War Thunder Wiki
Héja II (Italy) | War Thunder Wiki
WM-23 (Italy) | War Thunder Wiki
WM-21 (Italy) | War Thunder Wiki
Fokker D.XXI (France) | War Thunder Wiki
Fokker G.IA (France) | War Thunder Wiki
IAR-81C | War Thunder Wiki
IAR-93B | War Thunder Wiki
IAR-81C (DB 605) | War Thunder Wiki
HF-24 (Great Britain) | War Thunder Wiki
FFA P-16 (Germany) | War Thunder Wiki
C-3604 (Germany) | War Thunder Wiki
Unique Tanks
Harimau | War Thunder Wiki
Arjun Mk 1 | War Thunder Wiki
NOMADS | War Thunder Wiki
Csaba | War Thunder Wiki
Turan I | War Thunder Wiki
Zrinyi II | War Thunder Wiki
Turan III | War Thunder Wiki
Toldi IIA | War Thunder Wiki
Turan II | War Thunder Wiki
Zrinyi I | War Thunder Wiki
BT-42 | War Thunder Wiki
L-62 ANTI II | War Thunder Wiki
A.C.IV | War Thunder Wiki
A.C.I | War Thunder Wiki
1 Like
I’m not interested in people crying about why x nation got a trialed vehicle, I’m already against them as 99% of the time there is an alternative option
1 Like
It’s easy to understand braff
None of the Finnish vehicles you listed were added with the subtree and the subtree currently lacks a singular unique aircraft
It counters your own argument tbh
3 Likes
is there for the AHS and Mi-28 in Sweden?
Yeah don’t add them and for the MI-28 add the Fennec
Don’t know what answer you expected me to give, I’ve always been against the AHS and MI-28A
And weirdly enough each successive subtree has generally been worse in quality, value, and reception
Crazy that
i go to the suggestions to see what Sweden can offer…
what is this? not even 1 suggestion?
4 Likes
Yeah what do you want Sweden to add? They don’t use helicopters for ground they use them for naval
Once the M299 rails and AGM-114R arrive here we can replace the AHS with our helicopter
Seriously you want me to pull an answer from nothing, I can’t help that Sweden doesn’t have anything. We have stuff
Also possible they’re planning to add it simultaneously to Korea and Indonesia some time in the future when Korea is a thing.
I’m thinking of when they added the Me210 and said they waited so long because they wanted to bring in the Hungarian version as well etc etc
1 Like
What?
Yeah prop planes are cool and all, but there’s so many that it’s hard to consider them unique.
IAR-93B and FPA P-16 were both added with a revenue sharing program, AKA it cost Gaijin nothing.
HF-24 looks like it would be a revenue sharing plane, but I couldn’t find anything.
strange
but i understand why they added the 2 trial ones, not having a heli from 9.3-top is a huge gap
What do you mean?
People still are constantly bashing those three trees for having too much copy-paste.
You are moving the goal post
Why? Have you ever looked at Sweden, Finland, or Norways primary environment? It’s almost entire useless for non naval helicopters
Not like Finland is worried about Sweden attacking again lmao
Liberate Aland
1 Like
I’ve only seen people bash copy-paste in trees like Germany and France, where there are domestic options available but are not added because it costs money.
I guess bro. Either way, all the jets you mentioned were added as event vehicles or pack premiums. I was mainly looking at tech tree vehicles when I said that, but congrats dud you won the internet argument!! 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉