Anyone ready for the update?
No
1 Like
These are modified variants to Israeli specification. If you have evidence they are compatible, you can submit a report.
I’m ready for the huge amount of disappointment when people see that cluster weapons can’t be used in ground battles
2 Likes
About the Submarines, will they be part of the Bluewater or Coastal fleet or will make a Tree of their own? and countries that do not have naval can get Submarines?
Tbf we have vehicles that can use them as low as 10.3 and even lower, it would be chaos
Yeah, right, right, once again they’re asking players to provide public information. The F16I and F15I are still at 13.0, Gaijin has completely forgotten about them. I want to say something again, but if I do, my message will certainly be deleted. So, that’s it, I choose not to speak my true thoughts.
Damn, we are getting subs before HMS Royal Oak :(
Depending on what you say it might only be a short ban from the forums
I do wonder if subs will mean naval gets more focus from the snail in general
1 Like
he probably wanted to talk about the EAP so that would have been a perma ban
Yeah lets maybe not encourage people to break the rules because “its not that bad”.
1 Like
I hope so honestly, sonar system will probably make a return from the sub event
My assumption is that Gaijin hasn’t done much to improve cluster weapons since the initial test in April
That would mean that cluster weapons wouldn’t work like they do in real life, which would lead to them acting extremely weird in ground battles
As a reminder, towards the end of the Nuclear Thunder event cluster weapons wouldn’t split up, but rather spawn explosions in random spots around the impact point of the main weapon
I can argue about multiple things. The main promise of sub trees was filling gaps with the SA sub tree. The original vehicles discussion came with Finland, because of course we were not going to complain for the lack of original vehicles when SA tree dropped.
Yes the AMX-30s are performing worse now, yes you have a tree bias so the thing is still 8.7, yes there is a small gap at 8.3, yes people love Gepards and their APHE. And yes people will love the new vehicle. For me, it is just a meh patch to a non existent problem.
And the last topic. Benelux would be 3 times the tree Israel could be, but you are defending Dutch content in French tree today.
1 Like
iirc the main promise of the SA subtree was to add diveristy, not to explicitely fill gaps
Before delivery they were mounted during testing (AGM-65B/D), and integration remained (especially on the hardly modified Baraks in initial service).
It’s unknown if integration remained on more highly modified aircraft like the Sufa.
but that was for AI controlled cluster weapons
we all know that the stuff used by AI in NE is heavily simplified to improve server load
I clearly remember the claim “We wanted to introduce light tanks to British tech tree”
I mean I’ve had my fair share of “Forum Vacations” and bug reporting “vacations” so it’s more so just sharing in general what happens occasionally.
Btw are we going to get some more crew voices aside from the ones added recently? Myself and a few others are still 100% down to VA for gaijin so they don’t use AI or non native speakers
1 Like