@Smin1080p_WT Is there any plans for developers to rework thrust-vectoring mechanic? I know it’s not a new problem and has been around even back to the days of the SRAAM missile, but I wonder if there’s any plans on reworking thrust-vectoring in general or if we should submit bug reports for each missile’s thrust-vectoring issues
Should have used the regular German EF-2000 to get rid of the IRST
1 Like
afaik it will be the only 14.7 without MAWS otherwise. but the better RWR and more countermeasures will be nice regardless of MAWS
Speaking of tiny planes and vehicles gaijin should add but won’t due to copy and paste they should add the Finnish Hawks which were made in Finland as shown here
Resume
2 Likes
Would be nice to see this also for the Harriers so that VIFF’ing would be more effective.
1 Like
Pretty sure the Su-30SM2 doesn’t have MAWS either
2 Likes
Several thrust vectoring missiles like SRAAM have already had “reworks”. So its not exactly clear what you are asking here when asking about generic reworks. No there is no wider “rework” planned for this. Individual issues will be reviewed as reported.
1 Like
I wonder why you didn’t crop that image lol
1 Like
Seems like a rather predictable side effect of adding the Hawk 8 years late, you end up with some catching up to do.
1 Like
Takes too much effort when I can just highlight the important part
Could have kept that number at 4, if they didn’t add the premium T.1A
Then they could have added a South African or Indian one :)
Just wanted to ask about this, currently the two Indonesian vehicles (Harimau & 2RI) has British crew voices instead of what the patch notes mentioned above. Is this a client-side issue or a game-side issue?
1 Like
A very strange comment
Its not 8 years too late at all. All of the general advanced trainers and family memebers of this type have been introduced over the last 2 years.
Again, we have never had a rule where aircraft are added in chronological order. Particularly for the reason that the lower ranks, something which you yourself always advocate for, would never see new or interesting content, as everything would always be top tier.
does this mean its not to late for more cheiftains
If we had something new to announce in that regard, this would be done in a news item.
Naturally not, we added a new one just a year ago: [Development] Chieftain 900: Royal Ordnance’s Chieftain - News - War Thunder
Does this mean Danish F-35 or TF-35 is still on the table then?
1 Like
As Khorne said, SM2 doesn’t have MAWS. But it’s funny to think about the Super Hornet being the only plane without MAWS at 15.0, 15.3, and 15.7 especially when it gets next-gen missiles like AIM-424, AIM-260, and AIM-174B.