Then why can it mount the HARM, which is much larger than the AMRAAM?
Ask gaijin, they’ve removed loadouts because people reminded them of such things before or clipping issues, I’m just stating what I was told.
Probably more an SM with michaels, odd, but still 14.3 material likely.
The suggestion for the MKI says that it has MAWS, but to my knowledge the MAWS was added as an upgrade later on.
The Super Sukhoi includes an entirely new, Indian built AESA radar, dunno how it would compare to the Irbis-E.
1 Like
With what?
I’m curious why people want/expect MAWS on the F-15EX.
Just because it’s capable isn’t a good reason to add stuff. IRL the US doesn’t mount MAWS on the F-15EX as far as I know.
Imo stuff shouldn’t be added just because it’s “technically possible” unless there is a severe balancing reason to add it
But “muh USA suffers”
Because it good for situational awareness even if you turn of the auto flares pretty sure it’ll tell you if ir missile is being launched at you as well
1 Like
Has nothing to due with US TT as it happens in all trees and is promoted by players of all trees. Lots of RU vehicles with unrealistic mods/load outs too.
2 Likes
Actually the only one of those we don’t know is its weight. Its range is generally stated to be 200km+, and its size is nearly identical to that of the AMRAAM.
I hope to see CM tomorrow…
Spoiler
It’s because Russia had the Mig-35 and the US just wants the next best thing
The ZA was used by the Czechs which is what it was added under and perfectly fine to be. It was not 9added to Italy as the Italian MB-326b was planned at the same BR just a few months later in the same spot (premium). Which was more important for the Italian tree.
The L-39 is a famous Czech domestic jet, widely used by the Warsaw pact and USSR themselves. So it has every reason to be there and rightly under its Czech flag. Hence why I clarifed this and did not state the version in game was the USSR operated version.
Again, no reason to do this when it can be under its Czech flag as a domestic vehicle for them whilst in the warsaw pact. So theres no reason not to add it under its correct flag.
1 Like
there 2 MKI. depend on hwta you want.
there the 14.3 early mki just like the su30sm.
and late who is 14.7 with its upgrades being:
MAW / RWR / aesa ECM / SEAD / more CAS ( indian spice250 / kh31 ) / more air to air ( derby ER, assaram, astra ect… )
US are actively looking into adding MAWS capability to the 15EX as of late
You still need the complete dimensions for it to be modeled.
We don’t know if it uses dual pulse or not, we don’t know if it has AESA seeker or not, we don’t know its range either because only unreliable sources state its range.
2 Likes
Yup, but it currently doesn’t use it.
I lean towards don’t add stuff to vehicles in WT that they don’t use IRL. Goes for weapons and modules
Lots of others argue for things that are planned or talked about to be added even if they aren’t used IRL.
Was curious why that is. Leads to lots of players saying “well you added this a-historic load out/equipment to X vehicle, so you should add this a-historic load out/equipment to Y vehicle”
Because otherwise you end up with an old generation of an aircraft when it takes Gaijin ages to update it. Still waiting for the JAS39E wings to be fixed :/
While the Gripen E ‘s wings should be modeled correctly, don’t count on it changing the flight model.