that is not what the argument was about
what’s it abt
In fact it diverged 3x now
yea I’m losing track
yeah because Eagle wasnt able to understand an analogy
after that he went on about how it is impossible for the mig29 to use nato weapons
4 Likes
Let me help:
- you say Russia can’t use nato ARH
- Ron said it could and provided proof
- you also said Su-30MKI could use NATO stuff, which, surprise, is a Russian jet
- you backtracked because you contradicted yourself
- I came in, etc etc,
- infinity
2 Likes
You have any gueses what vehicle it could be?
@racimazzedine Do people here actually understand youth slang? Imagine being a adult and reading stuff as unc and other wierd words like ,craking"( i am so sorry mods, but lowkey i can only can up with this word ritgh now)
Su-15
yes it is impossible which migoon the mig29 guy somehow didn’t understand
I’m too much of an unc myself to understand youth slang
1 Like
I hope it’s this beauty:
(The big one)
3 Likes
and that just shows that you are not the brightest
the example was not about the practicality
it was to show that the generation of a jet is not defined by the weapons it carries
but instead of understanding that simple example you got hung up on NATO weapons being on the Mig-29
2 Likes
i dont use that much slang words, so sometimes i feel like a unc myself,
1 Like
ad hominem I rage quit
Nah man, you don’t get it
He has his own fighter jet generation system
1 Like
Mig-21 Bison is actually a 4th gen bc it can carry the R-77
trust
2 Likes
Youth? Brother any 25 years or less would understand the words.
1 Like
Well, by that logic I 100% am an unc
2 Likes
just search it on Google I guess